Euhemerism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Euhemerism is the idea that gods were once mortal men. The name comes from Euhemerus, a Greek mythographer who lived in the late 4th century BC, and it describes a method of reading mythology that traces divine figures back to real kings, real events, and real places that grew more fantastic with each retelling. According to this approach, the supernatural elaborations accumulate over generations, so that a memorable king becomes a deity and a historical cliff becomes the site of a divine abduction. That is the core claim: exaggeration, repeated across centuries, is the engine that turns history into myth. What kinds of thinkers adopted this idea? Why did early Christians find it useful as a weapon against pagan belief? And how did a Norse historian in 1220 place Odin in Asia Minor with a genealogy tracing back to the king of Troy? Those questions run through every chapter ahead.

• 2. Before Euhemerus

  ›

  Euhemerus was not the inventor of the rationalizing impulse. Euhemeristic views appear in earlier writings attributed to Sanchuniathon, Xenophanes, Herodotus, Hecataeus of Abdera, and Ephorus. What distinguished Euhemerus from this lineage was the durability of his influence. The classical poet Ennius, born in 239 BC, carried his ideas into Latin letters, and the modern author Antoine Banier, born in 1673, still positioned himself in his tradition. That long chain of reception is precisely why Euhemerus became the traditional founder rather than a footnote. Even so, in Plato's Phaedrus, Socrates had already modeled this kind of reading. He rationalized the myth of Boreas abducting Orithyia by treating Boreas as a natural gust of wind and Orithyia as a historical person who was simply pushed from a cliff. Socrates acknowledged the logic of the approach while also mocking the idea that it could work for every myth. He noted that creatures of "absurd forms" such as Centaurs and the Chimera could not be easily explained away. The tension Socrates identified, between partial rationalization and wholesale skepticism, would run through every subsequent version of euhemerism.

• 3. Deification and the Tomb of Zeus

  ›

  Euhemerus built his theory on a pattern he observed all around him: kings being turned into gods. Dion, the tyrant ruler of Syracuse, was worshipped as divine while he was still alive, and modern scholars consider his apotheosis to have directly influenced Euhemerus's thinking. Euhemerus was also living through the deification of the Seleucids and the "pharaoization" of the Ptolemies, a fusion of Hellenic and Egyptian traditions that made the elevation of rulers to divine status feel like a contemporary political fact rather than an ancient curiosity. The boldest application of this logic was his argument about Zeus. Euhemerus claimed Zeus was a mortal king who had died on Crete and that a tomb bearing his name still existed there. The idea was not new to him. The general sentiment of Crete during the time of Epimenides of Knossos, around 600 BC, was already that Zeus lay buried somewhere on the island. This belief earned the Cretans a reputation for atheism, and Epimenides himself called them all liars, a paradox that still carries his name. Callimachus, one of Euhemerus's fiercest opponents, attacked the Cretan tomb directly in verse. His lines survive: "Cretans always lie. For the Cretans even built a tomb, Lord, for you. But you did not die, for you are eternal." A later Latin scholium on the Hymns of Callimachus proposed that the tomb inscription had once read "the tomb of Minos, the son of Jupiter," but the words "Minos, the son" had eroded over time until only "the tomb of Jupiter" remained. Influenced by Euhemerus, Porphyry in the 3rd century AD claimed that Pythagoras had found the same tomb and carved an inscription reading: "Here died and was buried Zan, whom they call Zeus."

• 4. A Christian Weapon

  ›

  Hostile to paganism, early Christian thinkers found euhemerism immediately useful. If the pagan gods had once been ordinary men, then worshipping them was nothing more than misplaced ancestor veneration, and the whole edifice of pagan religion could be dismissed. Clement of Alexandria captured the appeal in a line from Cohortatio ad gentes: "Those to whom you bow were once men like yourselves." Cyprian, a North African convert to Christianity, made the argument with unusual directness in a short essay called De idolorum vanitate, written in 247 AD. He did not argue for euhemerism but assumed it, as though it needed no demonstration. His summary: "That those are no gods whom the common people worship, is known from this: they were formerly kings, who on account of their royal memory subsequently began to be adored by their people even in death." He moved straight to specific examples, naming Melicertes, Leucothea, and the Heavenly Twins Castor and Pollux. He also referred to a cave cult in Crete still active in his own time, noting "the cave of Jupiter is to be seen in Crete, and his sepulchre is shown." Eusebius in his Chronicle used the same logic to argue that the Babylonian god Baʿal was a deified ruler and that the god Belus was the first Assyrian king. Tertullian, Origen, and Arnobius deployed variations of the same argument. Isidore of Seville, whose encyclopedia became the most influential early medieval reference work, devoted a chapter specifically to euhemeristic genealogies of the pagan gods, drawing on a principle from Lactantius: "Those whom pagans claim to be gods were once mere men."

• 5. Medieval Continuity

  ›

  Christian writers during the Middle Ages continued to embrace euhemerism. Vincent of Beauvais, Petrus Comestor, Roger Bacon, and Godfrey of Viterbo all worked within this framework. The scholar John Daniel Cooke described the medieval position as holding that the ancient Greeks and Romans, though superior in most respects, had been in error about religion, and that the so-called gods were understood to have been real beings, sometimes possessing actual power, rather than mere figments. Petrus Comestor extended Isidore's work in his Historia scholastica, written around 1160, creating strict parallels between pagan legendary figures and the patriarchs of the Old Testament. Martin of Braga took the argument in a different direction, tracing idolatry to the survivors of Noah's flood, who had begun to worship the sun and stars instead of God. In his reading, the Greek gods were deified descendants of Noah. Snorri Sturluson, the Christian Icelandic bard and historian, applied euhemerism to Norse mythology in his Prose Edda, composed around 1220. He presented Odin not as a supernatural being but as a historical leader originally from Asia Minor, whose ancestry traced back to Priam, the king of Troy. As Odin traveled north to settle the Nordic countries, Snorri wrote that observers said of him and his companions: "Whatever countries they passed through, great glory was spoken of them, so that they seemed more like gods than men." That sentence is the hinge of Snorri's argument.

• 6. Modern Revivals and Critiques

  ›

  Antoine Banier's Mythologie et la fable expliqués par l'histoire, published in 1711, presented detailed arguments for reading Greek mythology through historical events. Jacob Bryant's A New System or Analysis of Ancient Mythology, published in 1744, pursued similar ground from a Biblical basis. George Stanley Faber's The Origin of Pagan Idolatry, published in 1816, proposed that all pagan nations had worshipped the same gods, all of whom were deified men. Outside Biblical scholarship, archaeologists found the theory attractive because myths sometimes pointed toward real sites. Heinrich Schliemann, a prominent archaeologist of the 19th century, believed myths carried historical truths and excavated Troy to prove it. He claimed to have recovered artifacts connected to figures from Greek mythology, including the Mask of Agamemnon and Priam's Treasure. Herbert Spencer drew on euhemeristic arguments to explore the anthropocentric origins of religion through ancestor worship. The twentieth century poet and mythographer Robert Graves offered euhemeristic readings in The White Goddess, published in 1948, and The Greek Myths, published in 1955. His proposals that myths record and justify the political and religious overthrow of earlier cult systems attracted wide criticism and are rejected by most scholars. More recently, author Richard Carrier has proposed a related but distinct concept he calls "euhemerization." Where euhemerism moves from history to myth, euhemerization runs the other direction: it means taking a cosmic god and placing him at a definite point in history as an actual person who was later deified. Carrier's framing points out that Euhemerus himself may have practiced this reverse operation, inventing a history for Zeus and Uranus rather than recovering one.