Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Empire

~11 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • An empire is a realm controlled by a monarch or other official and divided between a dominant center and subordinate peripheries. That center, sometimes called the metropole, holds political power over everything beyond it. Inside its borders, different populations may carry different sets of rights and may be governed in entirely different ways. The word itself descends from the Roman concept of Imperium. Yet for all its weight, the term resists a clean definition. Not every state with sprawling territory earns the name. Some self-declared empires were never accepted by their own contemporaries or by later historians. The Central African Empire of 1976 to 1979 is one such case. So are certain Anglo-Saxon kingdoms in early England. So what actually makes an empire an empire, and not merely a large state? Why did scholars come to disagree so bitterly over whether the word belongs to politics or to economics? Why did countries that once proudly wore the title vanish from the map in a single century, and why does the United States today refuse a label that critics keep trying to pin on it? The answers run from a city in southern Egypt around 3200 BC to the war on terror, and they pass through nearly every major civilization in between.

  • Michael W. Doyle defined empire as "effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society." That single sentence captures what most definitions circle around: one society commanding another. An empire, in this view, is an aggregate of many territories under a supreme ruler or oligarchy. It stands in contrast to a federation, which is an extensive state voluntarily composed of autonomous states and peoples. Rein Taagepera offered a tighter formula, calling an empire "any relatively large sovereign political entity whose components are not sovereign."

    Josep Colomer drew the sharpest line between empires and ordinary states. Empires, he argued, were vastly larger than states and lacked fixed or permanent boundaries, where a state had fixed ones. Empires gathered a compound of diverse groups and territorial units with asymmetric links to the center. A state, by contrast, claimed supreme authority over a single territory and population. Empires ran on multi-level, overlapping jurisdictions. States sought monopoly and homogenization.

    Peter Bang described empires as "composite, layered and anything but uniform in their internal organization of power." Sometimes, though, the word is only a semantic construction. When a ruler simply assumes the title of emperor, the polity logically becomes an empire even without gaining a single acre. Korea proclaimed itself an empire in 1897, far from expanding, while on the verge of being annexed by the Empire of Japan.

  • Edward Luttwak identified two main ways to build and hold an imperial structure. The first is a territorial empire of direct conquest and control by force. The second is a coercive, hegemonic empire of indirect control. Direct conquest yields greater tribute and tighter political grip, yet it pins military forces to fixed garrisons and chokes off further expansion. Indirect control delivers less tribute but frees those forces to keep pushing outward.

    The Roman Empire and the Mongol Empire show one branch of this divide. Both relied on land forces and consisted mostly of contiguous territory, a form scholars call tellurocracy. Territorial empires such as the Macedonian and Byzantine tended to extend directly outward from their original frontier. Their maritime counterpart is the thalassocracy, an empire of islands and coasts knit to a terrestrial homeland by a powerful navy. The Dutch Colonial Empire and the British Empire belong here, along with the Athenian-dominated Delian League, with their looser structures and scattered possessions.

    Many empires arose from outright military conquest, folding the vanquished into a political union. But that was never the only path. The Athenian, Roman, and British empires developed at least partly under elective auspices. The Holy Roman Empire came together by electing its emperor through votes from member realms in the Imperial election. The Empire of Brazil simply declared itself one after separating from the Portuguese Empire in 1822.

  • Lenin cancelled all earlier forms of imperialism and began its history in the 1760s, a move that detonated a century of scholarly argument. His definition stripped the essence of empire out of politics and fixed it on economics, denying that modern capitalist imperialism shared anything with the empires of the past. To Lenin, imperialism was the highest stage of capitalism, which meant it could not exist before 1876. Mainstream historians of empire were left puzzled. Such a concept, one objected, is not very helpful "if we do not know for certain whether it fits the facts of two millennia or two generations."

    Kenneth Waltz pressed the contradiction further. He believed the supposed cause of imperialism, capitalism, appeared much younger than its effect. It was, he wrote, as though Newton explained gravitation by a 17th-century phenomenon while ignoring that gravitation had operated earlier. Critics dismissed Lenin's work as a political pamphlet rather than a scientific thesis, suited for "the half-educated whose power of criticism was not fully developed."

    Michael Doyle observed that imperialism, through this lens, turned into an economic and European phenomenon. The pamphlet re-defined empire as the original sin of European peoples who had corrupted an innocent world. The word imperialist became, in his phrase, "the 20th-century version of the devil." Most historians, by contrast, recognize that imperialism predates European colonialism by several millennia, a gap the 2021 Oxford World History of Empire urged scholars to take seriously.

  • The earliest known empire appeared in southern Egypt sometime around 3200 BC. Southern Egypt then held three kingdoms, each centered on a powerful city, and Hierapolis conquered the other two over two centuries before growing into the country of Egypt. Sargon of Akkad built an early all-Mesopotamian empire in the 24th century BC, reaching into Anatolia, the Levant, and Ancient Iran. Shamshi-Adad I of Assyria and Hammurabi of Babylon repeated the feat in the 19th and 18th centuries BC.

    Thutmose III ruled the New Kingdom of Ancient Egypt in the 15th century BC, making it ancient Africa's major force by absorbing Nubia and the city-states of the Levant. In the Amarna Period, spanning the 15th to 13th centuries BC, Egypt joined the Middle Assyrian Empire, the Hittite Empire, the Mitanni, and the Elamites in a club of great powers. Egypt and the Hittites clashed at the Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC. The confrontation settled nothing, and the late Bronze Age collapse soon dissolved the entire system.

    The Neo-Assyrian Empire, lasting from 916 to 612 BC, was the first to recover. By 673 BC, Assyria had conquered the whole Fertile Crescent, including Cyprus and Egypt. The triumph proved short-lived. In the 6th century BC, the Median Empire, the Babylonians, the Scythians, and the Cimmerians allied against it, and their combined armies razed the Assyrian capital, Nineveh, in 612 BC. The fall of Nineveh marked the end of the River Valleys age. Never again would a world-leading empire be centered in a great river valley.

  • From 600 BC, the area of the largest empire would never again fall below 2.0 million square kilometers, a size never reached before that threshold. The Axial Age of the mid-first millennium BC saw the most dramatic imperial expansion in premodern history, sweeping across the Indo-Mediterranean region and China. It culminated with the Roman, Kushan, and Han Empires ruling as many as two-thirds of all people on Earth, the most extreme degree of imperial consolidation ever recorded.

    The Achaemenid Empire, from 550 to 330 BC, is considered the first great empire in history, often called the first world empire. It covered Mesopotamia, Egypt, parts of Greece, Thrace, the Middle East, much of Central Asia, and North-Western India. Alexander the Great overthrew it, and his short-lived empire passed to the Diadochi, whose Seleucid, Ptolemaic, and Antigonid states are grouped as the Hellenistic Empire. In India, Chandragupta Maurya founded the Maurya Empire in 322 BC with the help of Chanakya. Under Ashoka the Great it became the first Indian empire to conquer the whole peninsula, a feat repeated only by the Gupta and Mughal Empires.

    In 221 BC, the State of Qin ended the Warring States period and forged the Qin Empire, whose sovereign took the new title Huangdi, translated as Emperor. The Qin gave China the Great Wall, the Terracotta Army, and standardized currency, weights, measures, and writing. It laid the foundation for the Han dynasty, under whose Emperor Wu, from 156 to 87 BC, the Xiongnu were pacified and the Silk Road opened. In the first two centuries of the Common Era, only four empires stretched between the Pacific and the Atlantic: the Han, the Kushan, the Parthian, and the Roman.

  • The Romans were the first people to invent and embody the concept of empire, holding two mandates: to wage war and to make and execute laws. The Latin word imperium derives from imperare, meaning "to command," and first referred to a magistrate's authority, usually military. As Rome expanded overseas, the term came to describe its power over colonies and client states, and successful generals earned the honorific imperator, roughly "commander." Augustus established a new de facto monarchy while preserving the appearance of a republic, using the informal titles augustus and princeps, until imperator came to denote the office now called emperor.

    The Romans believed deeply in what a later age would call a civilizing mission. Cicero legitimized it, writing that only under Roman rule could the world flourish and prosper. The ideology spread across the Mediterranean and beyond. People began to build houses like Romans, eat the same food, wear the same clothes, and play the same games. Even citizenship and the authority to rule were granted to people born outside Roman territory. Yet the empire rested on exploitation, drawing slaves and money from the peripheries, and that absolute reliance on conquered peoples would ultimately bring it down.

    The Roman Catholic Church, founded in the early Imperial Period, spread across Europe first through evangelists and later through official promulgation. The legal systems of France and its former colonies remain strongly shaped by Roman law. The United States was founded on a model inspired by the Roman Republic, with upper and lower legislative assemblies and executive power vested in a single president. That president, as commander-in-chief, echoes the ancient titles imperator princeps. Since 2002, the source notes, all the world is divided among US commands that literally reflect Roman imperia.

  • In the mid-twentieth century the word empire took on a negative connotation, viewed as inherently immoral or illegitimate. Traditional or overt empire destroyed and discredited itself in the World Wars. The damage ran deepest in German, where empire is reich and instantly summons the Third Reich. For the first time in history, countries that had proudly called themselves empires disappeared from the map.

    The postwar world fell under two superpowers, both of which proclaimed themselves enemies of empire. The West contained the imperialist East while the East and the South resisted the imperialist West. As former colonies came to form the majority of states in the United Nations, the word lost all legitimacy in that forum. "Any state stupid enough to call itself an empire became subject automatically to UN resolutions on decolonisation."

    Decolonization then unwound the European empires one by one. The British Empire evolved into a loose Commonwealth of Nations, the French into a Francophone commonwealth, the Portuguese into a Lusophone one. France returned Kwang-Chou-Wan to China in 1946. Britain handed back Hong Kong in 1997 after 150 years, and the Portuguese territory of Macau reverted to China in 1999. Both Macau and Hong Kong became Special Administrative Regions rather than ordinary provinces. The Soviet Empire collapsed in 1989 to 1991, leaving the United States as the only superpower.

    Krishan Kumar argued that what vanished in the 20th century was only the name. No state calls itself an empire anymore, yet the phenomenon continues under other names, producing a world far from the theoretical one of equal states. Paraphrasing Mark Twain and William Faulkner, he suggested that rumors of empires' death are greatly exaggerated, and that their "past is never dead; it is not even past."

    The United States is the most widely discussed case. Thomas Jefferson called it an "Empire of Liberty" and argued that "no constitution was ever before so well calculated as ours for extensive empire and self government." In the 1780s, awaiting the fall of the Spanish empire, he predicted his country would gain its territory "piece by piece." Even so, the founding belief in anti-imperialist principles has kept many from naming America an empire. David Ludden describes "ideological blinders" that render the empire invisible to its own citizens, who, as he puts it, "prefer to depict the U.S. as a nation pursuing its own interests and ideals."

    The 2021 Oxford World History of Empire took the matter head on. Its editor, Peter Fibiger Bang, wrote that humanity has moved beyond the postcolonial moment and that imperialism has resurfaced. The leading military powers of today, the United States, China, and Russia, pursue imperial policies despite their anti-imperialist rhetoric. John M. MacKenzie, having listed the United States, China, Russia, Israel, and ISIS as contemporary imperial phenomena, reached a blunt conclusion: "What is incontrovertible is that empires are vital to an understanding not only of human history, but also of the world we live in now."

Continue Browsing

Common questions

What is the definition of an empire?

An empire is a realm controlled by a monarch or other official and divided between a dominant center and subordinate peripheries, where the center holds political power over the peripheries. Michael W. Doyle defined it as effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society. Rein Taagepera called it any relatively large sovereign political entity whose components are not sovereign.

What is the difference between an empire and a state?

Josep Colomer distinguished them by noting that empires were vastly larger than states and lacked fixed or permanent boundaries, while states had fixed boundaries. Empires were a compound of diverse groups and territorial units with asymmetric links to the center and ran on multi-level, overlapping jurisdictions, while states sought monopoly, homogenization, and supreme authority over a single territory and population.

Where does the word empire come from?

The word empire derives from the Roman concept of Imperium. The Latin word imperium comes from imperare, meaning to command, and originally referred to a magistrate's authority, usually in a military sense. As Rome expanded overseas, the term came to describe Rome's authority over its colonies and client states.

What was the earliest known empire?

The earliest known empire appeared in southern Egypt sometime around 3200 BC. Southern Egypt was divided among three kingdoms, each centered on a powerful city, and the city of Hierapolis conquered the other two over two centuries before growing into the country of Egypt.

How did Lenin define imperialism differently from earlier historians?

Lenin cancelled all earlier forms of imperialism and began its history in the 1760s, removing the essence of empire from politics and focusing on economics. He treated imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism, which meant it could not exist before 1876. Most mainstream historians, by contrast, recognize that imperialism predates European colonialism by several millennia.

Is the United States considered an empire?

Whether the United States qualifies as an empire is debated. Characterizing it as the American Empire is common, and Thomas Jefferson used the term Empire of Liberty, yet the country's founding anti-imperialist principles have prevented many from acknowledging that status. The 2021 Oxford World History of Empire argued that the United States, China, and Russia all pursue imperial policies despite their anti-imperialist rhetoric.

All sources

176 references cited across the entry

  1. 1bookIndividual rights and the making of the international systemChristian Reus-Smit — Cambridge University Press — 2013
  2. 2webEmpire
  3. 4bookEmpiresMichael Doyle — Cornell University Press — 5 September 2018
  4. 7bookTheory of international politicsKenneth Neal Waltz — Boston, Mass. : McGraw-Hill — 1979
  5. 11webIs the U.S. an Empire?Paul Schroeder — 2003-02-10
  6. 12journalSize and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.Rein Taagepera — 1979
  7. 13citationEmpire—A World HistoryPeter Fibiger Bang — Oxford University Press — 2021-03-03
  8. 14webempire
  9. 15webempireLoveToKnow, Corp. — 2018
  10. 16webempire
  11. 17webempire2018
  12. 18bookCoercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992Charles Tilly — Blackwell — 1990
  13. 19encyclopediaEmpires Versus StatesJosep M. Colomer — 2017
  14. 20journalRegional Modes of Production and Patterns of State Formation in Western EuropeMichael Hechter et al. — 1980
  15. 21bookEuropean Overseas Empire, 1879 - 1999: A Short HistoryMatthew G. Stanard — John Wiley & Sons — 2018
  16. 27bookThe Cassell Atlas of World HistoryJohn Haywood — Andromeda Oxford Ltd. — 1997
  17. 36bookThe Shaping of Western Civilization: From Antiquity to the EnlightenmentMichael Burger — University of Toronto Press — 2008
  18. 37bookThe Oxford Classical DictionarySimon Hornblower et al. — OUP Oxford — 2012
  19. 38webFrance – Legal HistoryKen Pennington — Columbus School of Law and School of Canon Law, The Catholic University of America
  20. 39webStanford scholar links Rome and America in Philadelphia exhibitionCynthia Haven — Stanford Report — February 19, 2010
  21. 40encyclopediaAncient Japan
  22. 41encyclopediaAncient Japanese & Chinese RelationsMark Cartwright — 27 June 2017
  23. 42encyclopediaAncient Korean & Chinese RelationsMark Cartwright — 30 November 2016
  24. 44journalTang Civilization and the Chinese CenturiesCraig Lockard — 1999
  25. 47bookSomali Sultanate: the Geledi city-state over 150 yearsVirginia Luling — Transaction Publishers — 2002
  26. 49bookNation Shapes: The Story behind the World's BordersFred M. Shelley — ABC-CLIO — 2013
  27. 50bookThe Slavs: Their Early History and CivilizationFrancis Dvornik — American Academy of Arts and Sciences — 1956
  28. 51bookSoutheastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250Florin Curta — Cambridge University Press — 2006
  29. 52bookOxford History of the Christian ChurchJ. M. Hussey, Andrew Louth — Oxford University Press — 2010
  30. 54bookMawlana Mawdudi and Political Islam: Authority and the Islamic StateRoy Jackson — Routledge — 2010
  31. 55bookMorality and Justice in Islamic Economics and FinanceMuhammad Umer Chapra — Edward Elgar Publishing — 2014
  32. 58bookDeveloping cultures: case studiesLawrence E. Harrison, Peter L. Berger — Routledge — 2006
  33. 60newsNapoleon, the Jews and French MuslimsMichael Goldfarb — 18 March 2007
  34. 63webHassan Ali Mirza's successionMurshidabad.net — 8 May 2012
  35. 64bookA History of State and Religion in IndiaIan Copland et al. — Routledge — 2012
  36. 65journalNote Upon the Natives of Savage Island, or NiueBasil Thomson — January 1901
  37. 71webPax BritannicaCarl P Watts
  38. 72bookWorld civilization: a brief historyRobin W. Winks — Collegiate Press — 1993
  39. 73bookShivajiSetumadhavarao R. Pagadi — National Book Trust, India — 1983
  40. 87bookWho's who in Nazi GermanyRobert Solomon Wistrich — Routledge — 2002
  41. 88bookY=Arctg X: The Hyperbola of the World OrderMax Ostrovsky — Bloomsbury Publishing PLC — 2007
  42. 89journalThe Causes of the Fall of the Roman EmpireAndré Piganiol — 1950
  43. 90bookHistory of the Later Roman EmpireJohn Bury — Dover Publications — 2011
  44. 91bookThe Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the BarbariansPeter Heather — Oxford University Press — 2007
  45. 93bookThe Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 44: 1 July to 10 November 1804Thomas Jefferson — Princeton University Press — 2019
  46. 94webAmerican Imperialism? No Need to Run Away from LabelMax Boot — Council on Foreign Relations op-ed, quoting USA Today — May 6, 2003
  47. 95journalAmerica's Invisible Empire30 October 2004
  48. 96bookNation-states and nationalisms organization, ideology and solidaritySinisa Malesevic — Polity Press — 2013
  49. 99bookHow to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United StatesDaniel Immerwahr — Farrar, Straus and Giroux — 2019
  50. 103newsLiving in a euro wonderlandIan Black — December 20, 2002
  51. 104newsEU gets its military fistDecember 13, 2002
  52. 105journalEU's region-building and boundary-drawing policies: the European approach to the Southern Mediterranean and the Western Balkans 1Nikolaos Tzifakis — informaworld — April 2007
  53. 108bookEurope as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European UnionJan Zielonka — Oxford University Press — 2006
  54. 109av mediaEuropean UnionTony Benn — 25 March 2013
  55. 110webVlad the Invader: Putin is looking to rebuild Russia's empireNiall Ferguson — February 24, 2022
  56. 111webContending With the New Russian EmpireDavid L. Phillips — February 25, 2022
  57. 112webRussia's attempt to build a Third EmpireLea Berriault — May 6, 2022
  58. 113magazineThe War in Ukraine Is a Colonial WarTimothy Snyder — April 28, 2022
  59. 116newsAnalysis Putin makes his imperial pretensions clearIshaan Tharoor — 2022-06-13
  60. 117webThe Russian Empire Must DieAnne Applebaum — November 14, 2022
  61. 120journalImperialism, Liberalism & the Quest for Perpetual PeaceAnthony Pagden — 2005
  62. 127journalOn the Application of Intelligence to World AffairsQuincy Wright — August 1, 1948
  63. 128journalInternal History of Society or Universal History?Friedrich Tenbruck — 1994
  64. 129bookRoyal Commentaries of the Incas and General History of PeruGarcilaso de la Vega — University of Texas Press — 1966
  65. 130bookTheory and Practice of the Balance of Power, 1486–1914: Selected European WritingsJohann Gottlieb Fichte — 1975
  66. 139bookThe Frontier in American HistoryFrederick Jackson Turner — 1920
  67. 149webMonthly Review | The New Geopolitics of EmpireJohn Bellamy FosterTopics: Imperialism Political Economy Stagnation — January 1, 2006
  68. 170bookCrusade for Pan-EuropeRichard von Coudenhove-Kalergi — G. P. Putnam's Sons — 1943
  69. 171bookA Study of HistoryArnold J. Toynbee — Oxford University Press — 1954
  70. 172bookA Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963Marc Trachtenberg — Princeton University Press — 1999
  71. 173journalRethinking the Origins of American HegemonyJohn G. Ikenberry — 1989
  72. 174journalEmpire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952Geir Lundestad — 1986
  73. 175bookThe United States and Western Europe since 1945: From 'Empire' by Invitation to Transatlantic DriftGeir Lundestad — Oxford University Press — 2005
  74. 179journalAmerica's Imperial DilemmaDimitri Simes — 2003
  75. 180bookEmpiresMichael Doyle — Cornell University Press — 1986
  76. 181journalThe Future of the American EmpireSusan Strange — 1988
  77. 182magazineThe Future of ManBertrand Russell — April 1951