Emancipation Proclamation

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  On the 1st of January, 1863, Abraham Lincoln sat down and signed a document that would change the legal status of more than 3.5 million enslaved human beings. He called it Proclamation 95. The night before, African Americans across the United States, free and enslaved, had gathered for Watch Night ceremonies they called "Freedom's Eve," counting down the hours toward midnight. What they were waiting for was not a law passed by Congress, not a constitutional amendment. It was an executive order issued by a wartime president on the grounds that freeing enslaved people was a military necessity. How did a document so deliberately narrow in scope become one of the most consequential acts in American history? What was Lincoln actually trying to do when he wrote it? And why, a century later, would Martin Luther King Jr. and Lyndon Johnson still be invoking its unfinished promise?

• 2. The Constitutional Tightrope

  ›

  The Constitution of 1787 never used the word "slavery" but was woven through with its logic. The Three-Fifths Compromise, written into Article I, Section 2, allocated congressional representation based on counting free persons fully and all other persons at three-fifths. The Fugitive Slave Clause in Article IV ensured that no enslaved person could gain legal freedom simply by crossing a state line. And the Fifth Amendment, which prohibited the deprivation of property without due process, had been interpreted to treat enslaved people as property. The Supreme Court's 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford turned that interpretation into binding law.

  Lincoln understood this terrain intimately. Before the war, he accepted the conventional reading that the federal government had no power to end slavery in states where it already existed. Between 1777 and 1804, every Northern state had moved toward abolishing slavery within its borders. No Southern state had followed. By the time the war began, the enslaved population of the South had grown to nearly four million people.

  When Lincoln finally reached for a legal basis to act, he did not go through Congress. He invoked his authority as Commander-in-Chief under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, issuing the Proclamation as a war measure, not a humanitarian gesture. That choice was deliberate and carefully limited his reach: he could only act against states in rebellion, which meant the four slaveholding border states that remained in the Union, Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, and Delaware, were left untouched. West Virginia, still legally considered part of the reorganized state of Virginia in January 1863, was also not named. The Attorney General, Edward Bates, had to work through the language of the Dred Scott decision to answer Lincoln's pressing question: could slaves freed through a wartime proclamation be re-enslaved once the war was over? Bates concluded they could remain free, though Lincoln understood that only a constitutional amendment could make abolition permanent.

• 3. One Hundred Days

  ›

  Lincoln first showed his draft to Secretary of State William Seward and Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles on the 13th of July 1862. The two men were initially speechless. Seward warned that issuing such a proclamation in the middle of military setbacks would look like the Union's "last shriek of retreat." He advised Lincoln to wait for a Union victory.

  On July 22, Lincoln laid the draft before his full cabinet. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton supported it. Seward still counseled delay. What Lincoln needed was a battlefield result that would give his order credibility.

  It came in September 1862 at Antietam. Though Union casualties were heavier than Confederate ones, and though General McClellan allowed Robert E. Lee's troops to escape, Union forces turned back a Confederate invasion of Maryland and destroyed more than a quarter of Lee's army. Five days later, on the 22nd of September, Lincoln called his cabinet back into session. According to Civil War historian James M. McPherson, Lincoln told cabinet members that he had made a solemn vow to God that if Lee was driven back, he would declare freedom for the enslaved.

  That day he issued what became known as the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. It gave rebel states a hundred days to return to the Union before he would free their enslaved people on the 1st of January 1863. In December 1862, out of concern that Lincoln might retreat from his promise, John Murray Forbes published pamphlets containing the Preliminary Proclamation's text and announcing the forthcoming final version. He worked with Massachusetts Governor John Andrew to distribute them to Union soldiers.

  Behind the scenes, Lincoln kept his options open. Historian William W. Freehling notes that from mid-October to mid-November 1862, Lincoln sent personal envoys to Louisiana, Tennessee, and Arkansas, each carrying a letter suggesting that if those states wished to avoid the Proclamation's terms and "have peace again upon the old terms," they could do so by electing members of Congress friendly to that goal. As late as the 1st of December 1862, Lincoln proposed a constitutional amendment that would have compensated states that abolished slavery on their own before the 1st of January, 1900, and would have allowed states to reintroduce slavery if they repaid the bonds. Adoption of that proposal could, in theory, have ended the war without permanently ending slavery.

• 4. What the Proclamation Actually Did

  ›

  The Final Emancipation Proclamation named ten states still in rebellion on the 1st of January 1863: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, and North Carolina. Tennessee was excluded because a Union-controlled military government had already been established in Nashville. Specific exemptions carved out 48 counties that would soon form West Virginia, seven other named Virginia counties, New Orleans, and 13 named Louisiana parishes near the city. In all, these exemptions left an additional 300,000 enslaved people unemancipated.

  Secretary of State Seward captured the paradox in a dry observation: "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

  Yet the Proclamation's immediate effect was not nothing. Estimates of how many people were freed on the 1st of January 1863, are uncertain, but one contemporary estimate put the contraband population of Union-occupied North Carolina at around 10,000, and the Sea Islands of South Carolina also held a substantial number. Those 20,000 people, by one calculation, gained freedom the day the Proclamation took effect. Eyewitness accounts from Hilton Head Island and Port Royal record public celebrations as thousands learned of their legal status.

  Booker T. Washington, a boy of nine in Virginia, remembered hearing the news in early 1865. He recalled that the singing in the slave quarters grew bolder, lasted later into the night, and carried more ring as the day approached. A stranger, probably a United States officer, made a short speech, read the Proclamation, and told them they were all free to go where and when they pleased. His mother, standing beside him, leaned over and kissed her children while tears ran down her face. She told him this was the day she had long prayed for, fearing she would never live to see it.

  As Union forces moved south, the Proclamation served as the legal framework for liberation across an expanding territory. Around 25,000 to 75,000 people were freed immediately in areas already under Union control. Nearly 200,000 Black men, most of them formerly enslaved, eventually joined the Union Army.

• 5. Diplomatic Calculation

  ›

  Lincoln had a specific international goal in mind when he issued the Proclamation: to make European intervention on behalf of the Confederacy politically impossible. Britain and France had debated recognizing the Confederacy as a sovereign nation. Public opinion in Britain had tolerated watching the war as a clash between rival governments. Once the war was explicitly about slavery, that calculation changed.

  Henry Adams wrote from London that the Proclamation had done more for the Union cause than all their previous military victories and all their diplomacy combined. In Italy, the general and nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi hailed Lincoln as the heir to John Brown's legacy. On the 6th of August, 1863, Garibaldi wrote to Lincoln directly, telling him that posterity would call him "the great emancipator, a more enviable title than any crown could be."

  Abel Haywood, a representative for workers from Manchester, England, wrote to Lincoln praising his steps toward fulfilling the principle that all men are created free and equal. The Emancipation Proclamation, combined with the Confederate failure at Antietam, removed any practical prospect of foreign military aid to the South.

  The diplomatic gain came with a complication the source does not soften: arms sales from British firms and dealers to the Confederacy continued through blockade running, with knowledge of the British government. The Confederacy was able to sustain the fight for two more years largely due to weapons supplied through those routes. By one calculation, those blockade runners operating from Britain were responsible for the deaths of 400,000 additional soldiers and civilians on both sides.

• 6. Contested Meaning

  ›

  From the moment Lincoln issued the Proclamation, its meaning was fought over. Copperhead Democrats denounced it immediately. Horatio Seymour, running for governor of New York, described it as a proposal for "the butchery of women and children, for scenes of lust and rapine, and of arson and murder." Henry A. Reeves, editor of the Republican Watchman in Greenpoint, Long Island, called it a plan that imperiled the liberty of white men to test an "utopian theory of equality of races which Nature, History and Experience alike condemn as monstrous."

  In the 1862 elections, Democrats gained 28 seats in the House and the governorship of New York. Lincoln's friend Orville Hickman Browning told him that the Proclamation and the suspension of habeas corpus had been "disastrous" for his party. Lincoln made no response.

  Frederick Douglass, speaking at the Cooper Union in February 1863 and published in the New-York Tribune, offered a different verdict, calling the Proclamation "the greatest event of our nation's history, if not the greatest event of the century."

  On the Confederate side, the reaction split along unexpected lines. President Jefferson Davis threatened on January 12 to send any U.S. military officer captured in Confederate territory to state authorities to face charges of "exciting servile insurrection," a capital offense. In May 1863, the Confederacy passed a law demanding retaliation and decreed that Black U.S. soldiers captured in battle would be tried as slave insurrectionists and executed. Less than a year after that law's passage, Confederate forces massacred Black U.S. soldiers at Fort Pillow.

  Yet some Confederate observers welcomed the Proclamation. One cavalry sergeant from Kentucky argued it was worth 300,000 soldiers to the Confederate cause because it clarified what the war was actually about. The price of enslaved people in the Confederacy rose in the months after the Proclamation's issuance, with one South Carolinian opining in 1865 that now was the time to purchase enslaved women and children.

  A century later, the scholarly debate continued. Richard Hofstadter wrote that the Proclamation "had all the moral grandeur of a bill of lading" and freed slaves precisely where it could not reach them. Allen C. Guelzo noted that professional historians had devoted surprisingly few major scholarly studies to the document. In his assessment, Lincoln was the United States' "last Enlightenment politician," whose key virtue was prudence. Eric Foner put it more directly: Lincoln held racist views typical of his time and did not favor immediate abolition before the war, but during the Civil War he displayed a remarkable capacity for moral and political growth.

• 7. The Unfinished Promise

  ›

  On the 12th of September, 1962, exactly one hundred years after Lincoln issued the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered an "Emancipation Proclamation Centennial Address" in New York City. He placed the document alongside the Declaration of Independence as an "imperishable" contribution to civilization. He lamented that the United States had "proudly professed" the principles of both documents while "sadly practiced the antithesis of these principles." He concluded that the only way to commemorate the Proclamation was to make its declarations real.

  The following year, King opened his speech at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial by invoking the document directly. He noted that a hundred years after the signing, the life of Black Americans remained "sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination."

  King and his associates had also, in the early 1960s, called on President John F. Kennedy to issue an executive order ending segregation, a document they called the "Second Emancipation Proclamation." Kennedy did not issue one. On the 11th of June 1963, Kennedy spoke on national television about civil rights and invoked the centennial of the Proclamation, asking whether the United States was prepared to say it was "a land of the free except for the Negroes." He announced a comprehensive civil rights bill and pushed for its passage until his assassination on the 22nd of November 1963. Historian Peniel E. Joseph credits the moral force of that June 11 speech with helping Lyndon Johnson get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 signed into law on the 2nd of July, 1964.

  Johnson himself had invoked the Proclamation two years earlier, speaking from Gettysburg on the 30th of May, 1963. He told his audience that emancipation would remain "a proclamation but not a fact" until justice was blind to color, education was unaware of race, and opportunity was unconcerned with the color of men's skins. He returned to it again on the 15th of March, 1965, presenting the Voting Rights Act to Congress one week after violence was inflicted on peaceful civil rights marchers during the Selma to Montgomery marches, and told the joint session that a century had passed since the Negro was freed, and he was not fully free that night.

  The Emancipation Proclamation was commemorated on a United States postage stamp issued on the 16th of August, 1963, designed by Georg Olden, with an initial printing of 120 million copies authorized for the opening day of the Century of Negro Progress Exhibition in Chicago.