Dudo of Saint-Quentin
Dudo of Saint-Quentin was born in the 960s in the very town that would give him his name, a Picard scholar who became the first historian of the Normans. He was sent on a diplomatic mission to the court of Richard I of Normandy in 987, and what began as a piece of political business would eventually become one of the most debated works of medieval historiography. The question that has occupied scholars for centuries is a simple one: was Dudo writing history, or something closer to legend? And if legend, does that make his account worthless, or does it preserve something that no document could?
By 987, Dudo held the position of canon at St Quentin, whose abbacy was controlled by the counts of Vermandois. It was Albert I, Count of Vermandois, who dispatched him on that first diplomatic mission to Richard I of Normandy, a mission Dudo carried out successfully. That success opened a door. In the two years before Richard's death in 996, Dudo became a regular visitor to the Norman court, building a relationship with the duke that would shape the rest of his career.
In a letter to Adalbero, Bishop of Laon, Dudo recorded what Richard asked of him directly: to write a work capturing the customs and deeds of the Norman Land, along with the rights established within the kingdom of his grandfather Rollo. It was a commission with deep political weight. Richard wanted his dynasty's origins written down, shaped into a coherent narrative, and handed to posterity.
Dudo wrote his Historia Normannorum during a second stay in Normandy, somewhere between 996 and 1015, under the continued urging of Duke Richard. The work he produced has an unusual and somewhat troubling character: Dudo does not appear to have consulted any existing documents at all. His information came almost entirely from oral tradition, and a large portion of that was supplied by Raoul, count of Ivry, who was a maternal half-brother of Duke Richard.
This reliance on oral sources gave the Historia a quality that scholars have long noted. It partakes of the nature of a romance. Historians such as Ernst Dummler and Georg Waitz have regarded it as fundamentally untrustworthy on that ground. Others, including Jules Lair and Johannes Steenstrup, have argued that while a legendary element certainly exists, the book still holds considerable value for understanding the Normans. The debate has never been fully resolved.
Dudo was acquainted with Virgil's Aeneid and other Latin writers, yet his own Latin has been described as affected and obscure. The Historia itself moves between prose and verse, drawing on several different metres, and is divided into four parts. It covers Norman history from 852 through to the death of Duke Richard in 996, and its tone throughout is one of open glorification of the Normans.
More recently, the scholar Leah Shopkow has argued that Carolingian hagiography shaped what Dudo was attempting. Two saints' lives in particular seem to have served as models: the ninth-century Vita S. Germani by Heiric of Auxerre, and the early tenth-century Vita S. Lamberti by Stephen of Liege. These were not histories in the modern sense but lives of saints, written to sanctify and elevate their subjects. Dudo may have been doing something structurally similar with the Norman dukes.
One of the most specific and striking passages in the Historia concerns language. Dudo claims that Richard I of Normandy was sent by his father William I Longsword to learn the "Dacian" tongue, the old Norse language, from a teacher called Bothon. In the same passage, Dudo records that the inhabitants of Bayeux more often spoke "Dacian" than "Roman", meaning Old French.
That observation has drawn serious attention from historians of language. It is a rare piece of testimony about where Norse-speaking communities survived longest in Normandy, and it points to Bayeux as a pocket of linguistic continuity long after Norse had faded elsewhere. Whatever one makes of Dudo's reliability as a historian of events, details like this one carry genuine documentary weight.
Despite the controversy over its reliability, the Historia Normannorum was used extensively by later chroniclers. William of Jumieges, Wace, Robert of Torigni, William of Poitiers, and Hugh of Fleury all drew on it when compiling their own accounts of Norman history. Dudo's work, for all its romance-like qualities, shaped how Normandy understood and told its own past for generations.
The Historia first appeared in print in 1619, when Andre Duchesne published it in Paris as part of his Historiae Normannorum scriptores antiqui. A further edition appeared in the Patrologia Latina, tome 141, published in Paris in 1844 by J. P. Migne. The edition that scholars have generally considered most reliable is the one edited by J. Lair and published at Caen in 1865. Dudo himself died before 1043, and his role as dean of Saint-Quentin is the last detail the record preserves of a life largely spent shaping how others would remember the Normans.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
Who was Dudo of Saint-Quentin?
Dudo of Saint-Quentin was a Picard historian and dean of Saint-Quentin, born in the 960s. He was sent on a diplomatic mission to the Norman court in 987 and became the author of the Historia Normannorum, the earliest major history of the Normans. He died before 1043.
What is the Historia Normannorum by Dudo of Saint-Quentin?
The Historia Normannorum, also known as Libri III de moribus et actis primorum Normanniae ducum and Gesta Normannorum, is Dudo's history of the Normans written between 996 and 1015. It covers Norman history from 852 to the death of Duke Richard I in 996 and is written alternately in prose and verse across four parts. It was dedicated to Adalberon, Bishop of Laon.
Is Dudo of Saint-Quentin considered a reliable historian?
Dudo's reliability has been disputed since the medieval period. Historians such as Ernst Dummler and Georg Waitz regarded the Historia as untrustworthy because Dudo relied on oral tradition rather than written documents, giving it the quality of a romance. Others, including Jules Lair and Johannes Steenstrup, argue it still holds considerable value for understanding Norman history despite its legendary elements.
What did Dudo of Saint-Quentin say about the language spoken at Bayeux?
Dudo recorded that the inhabitants of Bayeux more often spoke "Dacian" (old Norse) than "Roman" (Old French). He also claimed that Richard I of Normandy was sent by his father William I Longsword to learn the Norse language from a teacher called Bothon.
Who were the sources for Dudo of Saint-Quentin's Historia Normannorum?
Dudo obtained his information primarily from oral tradition rather than written documents. A large portion was supplied by Raoul, count of Ivry, who was a maternal half-brother of Duke Richard I of Normandy.
When was Dudo of Saint-Quentin's Historia Normannorum first published?
The Historia Normannorum was first published in 1619 by Andre Duchesne in Paris as part of his Historiae Normannorum scriptores antiqui. A further edition appeared in the Patrologia Latina in 1844, and the edition considered most authoritative was edited by J. Lair and published at Caen in 1865.