Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Dictys Cretensis

6 min listen · Ch. 1 of 6
6 sections
  • Dictys Cretensis, "Dictys of Crete," was supposedly a companion of the Cretan hero Idomeneus during the Trojan War. He was said to have kept a diary of the war's events, drawing on much of the same material that Homer later shaped into the Iliad. The remarkable thing is that nobody in antiquity seems to have taken this story too seriously at first. It was, by most reasonable accounts, an amusing fiction aimed at a knowledgeable Alexandrian audience. But somewhere in the centuries that followed, the joke stopped being funny. The story began to be treated as history.

    How does a fictional author become a genuine ancient authority? How does a leaden box buried in a tomb become the key to an entire literary tradition? And why, for the whole medieval West, did the Trojan War look less like Homer and more like Dictys? These are the questions worth following.

  • In the 4th century AD, a writer named Q. Septimius published a work called Dictys Cretensis Ephemeris belli Trojani, which translates as "Dictys of Crete, Chronicle of the Trojan War." It ran to six books. The text presented itself as a Latin translation of an earlier Greek version, itself supposedly derived from the ancient diary of Dictys.

    The Dictys of legend was a figure from Knossos, identified as a companion of Idomeneus. The story gave him a front-row seat at Troy. What Q. Septimius provided was the vehicle by which this figure's supposed eyewitness account could reach readers across the Latin-speaking world. The work's chief significance was not its literary merit but its timing and its reach. As knowledge of Greek faded from Western Europe, Dictys and the companion work by Dares Phrygius, known as De excidio Trojae, became the two main conduits through which the entire Homeric tradition entered the Romance literature of the Middle Ages.

  • The prologue to the Latin text is itself a small masterpiece of fabrication. It tells the reader how the manuscript survived: Dictys, it claimed, wrote his diary on tablets of limewood or tree bark using Phoenician characters. At his death, the tablets were sealed in a leaden box and buried with him, as he had wished.

    There the box stayed, the prologue insists, until the thirteenth year of Nero's reign, when an earthquake cracked open the tomb. Shepherds found the box, and finding no treasure inside, brought it to their master Eupraxis. He passed it to a Roman governor named Rutilius Rufus, who in turn sent it and Eupraxis himself to the emperor. Nero called in experts in Phoenician script, had the text translated into Greek, deposited the Greek version in a public library, and sent Eupraxis home loaded with rewards.

    The name Eupraxis is itself a wink to any reader paying attention. In Greek it simply means "right actions," a phrase well-known from discussions of ethics. Whoever crafted the prologue chose the finder's name with dry wit, nudging the knowing reader toward the joke buried inside the earnest frame narrative.

  • Not every copy of the Dictys text carries the same prologue. One major group of manuscripts replaces the earthquake story with a letter written as if by Q. Septimius Romanus to a friend named Q. Arcadius Rufus. In this version, the writer says the volume fell into his hands and that he converted it into Latin partly for his own amusement and partly for the instruction of others.

    The modern editor Werner Eisenhut studied these two traditions and concluded that neither should be consistently preferred. His view was that they represent two separate published editions from Late Antiquity. The fact that two distinct versions circulated, each with its own framing, tells us that editors and copyists in the ancient and early medieval world were actively reworking this text rather than merely transmitting it. Byzantine writers eventually incorporated Dictys into universal histories, and figures such as Joannes Malelas, Constantinus Porphyrogenitus, Georgius Cedrenus, Constantinus Manasses, and both Joannes and Isaacus Tzetzes cited him as an author of the highest authority. The work was known at least as early as the age of Aelian.

  • Petrarch owned a copy of Ephemeris belli Troiani and treated it as his key to Homer. That manuscript is now identified as the Codex Parisinus Lat. 5690, held at the Bibliotheque nationale. For a reader of Petrarch's time, when Homer was largely inaccessible in the Latin West, Dictys served as a substitute and a guide.

    The first printed edition appeared early, no later than 1471. That date places it among the very first wave of books produced after the introduction of the printing press to Europe, which speaks to how seriously this text was regarded by humanist scholars. Whether those scholars would have been quite so reverent had they known what the papyri would later reveal is another question.

  • For centuries, scholars disputed whether any Greek original of Dictys had ever actually existed. The question mattered because the text's whole authority rested on its claim to be a translation. Bernard Grenfell and Arthur Hunt settled the debate in 1899-1900 when they found a Greek fragment among the Tebtunis papyri. That fragment showed the Latin was a close and faithful translation of a genuine Greek source.

    A separate surprise came from a library in Italy. In the collection of conte Aurelio Guglielmo Balleani at Jesi, a manuscript of Dictys turned up that dated to the latter part of the 9th century. It was described and collated by C. Annibaldi in 1907. Together, these two finds recast the history of the text: Dictys was not simply a late Latin forgery but a translation of a Greek text that had circulated well before the 4th century. The fiction was older, and more widespread, than anyone had assumed. For scholars studying the channels through which Troy reached the medieval imagination, those discoveries pointed toward a tradition independent of Homer that had been quietly running in parallel all along.

Common questions

Who was Dictys Cretensis and why is he significant?

Dictys Cretensis, or Dictys of Crete, was the purported author of a diary of the Trojan War, said to have been a companion of the Cretan hero Idomeneus. His significance lies in the fact that his Chronicle, along with the De excidio Trojae by Dares Phrygius, became the primary source through which the Homeric legends reached the Romance literature of the medieval West after knowledge of Greek faded in Western Europe.

Who published the Latin Chronicle of Dictys Cretensis and when?

A writer named Q. Septimius published the Dictys Cretensis Ephemeris belli Trojani in the 4th century AD. The six-book work presented itself as a Latin translation of an earlier Greek version of Dictys's supposed eyewitness diary.

What does the prologue of Dictys Cretensis say about how the manuscript was discovered?

The prologue claims Dictys wrote his diary in Phoenician characters on tablets of limewood or tree bark, which were sealed in a leaden box and buried with him. In the thirteenth year of Nero's reign, an earthquake cracked open the tomb, shepherds found the box, and it eventually reached the emperor Nero, who had it translated into Greek and deposited in a public library.

What did Bernard Grenfell and Arthur Hunt discover about Dictys Cretensis in 1899-1900?

Grenfell and Hunt found a Greek fragment of Dictys among the Tebtunis papyri, settling a long scholarly dispute by proving that a genuine Greek original existed. The fragment showed the Latin text by Q. Septimius was a close and faithful translation of that Greek source.

What manuscript of Dictys Cretensis was found at Jesi and when was it described?

A manuscript of Dictys dating to the latter part of the 9th century was found in the library of conte Aurelio Guglielmo Balleani at Jesi. It was described and collated by C. Annibaldi in 1907.

Did Petrarch own a copy of the Dictys Cretensis Chronicle?

Yes. Petrarch owned a copy of Ephemeris belli Troiani and used it as his key to Homer. That manuscript is now identified as the Codex Parisinus Lat. 5690, held at the Bibliotheque nationale in Paris.