— Ch. 1 · The French Roots Of Decentralization —
Decentralization.
~7 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
In 1794, the post-Revolution French Directory leadership created a new government structure that introduced the word centralisation into common usage. The term decentralisation entered the vocabulary in the 1820s as political debates shifted across Europe. By the mid-1800s, Alexis de Tocqueville observed that the French Revolution began with a push towards decentralization but ended as an extension of centralization. In 1863, retired French bureaucrat Maurice Block wrote an article called Decentralization for a French journal to review these dynamics. He examined how government functions were being redistributed away from Parisian control toward local entities.
Ideas of liberty and decentralization reached their logical conclusions during the 19th and 20th centuries through anti-state activists known as anarchists and libertarians. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who lived from 1809 to 1865, argued that all his economic ideas could be summed up as agricultural-industrial federation. His political ideas boiled down to a similar formula: political federation or decentralization. These thinkers believed that accumulating local freedoms would create a counterweight against claims by the central government.
The early 20th century saw America respond to the centralization of economic wealth with a decentralist movement. This movement blamed large-scale industrial production for the decline of middle-class shopkeepers and small manufacturers. It promoted increased property ownership and a return to small-scale living. The movement attracted Southern Agrarians like Robert Penn Warren and journalist Herbert Agar. Later figures included Ralph Borsodi, Wendell Berry, Paul Goodman, and Carl Oglesby.
Systems Theory And Organizational Goals
Norman Johnson of Los Alamos National Laboratory wrote in a 1999 paper defining a decentralized system where some decisions are made without centralized control. He noted that an important property of agent systems is the degree of connectivity between agents. If each agent exchanges states or influences with all other agents, then the system becomes highly connected. University of California Irvine's Institute for Software Research adopted Rohit Khare's definition stating that a decentralized system requires multiple parties to make their own independent decisions.
Decentralization serves as a response to problems found within centralized systems. In government contexts, it addresses issues such as economic decline and the inability of governments to fund services effectively. It also responds to demands from minorities for greater say in local governance. Global pressure on countries with inefficient systems often drives these reforms forward. Four goals frequently appear in various analyses of decentralization efforts worldwide.
Participation remains a core objective where the principle of subsidiarity dictates that the lowest authority capable of addressing an issue should do so. Diversity plays an equally critical role in decentralized systems like ecosystems and social groups. Norman L. Johnson defined diversity as unique properties not shared by the larger group. Both decentralization and diversity are necessary attributes to achieve self-organizing properties. Efficiency gains come from reducing congestion in communications and allowing quicker reactions to unanticipated problems.