Dating

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Dating, as a named social practice, is younger than most people assume. The earliest recorded use of the noun "date" in the romantic sense appeared in 1896, in the writings of George Ade, a columnist for the Chicago Record. Ade was describing something new: a woman meeting a man outside the private sphere of the home. Within three years, he used the phrase "Date Book" in his 1899 collection Fabels in Slang to describe a ledger kept by a shop cashier tracking her suitors until marriage. A single word, coined in a newspaper column, named a practice that would reshape how human beings find each other. How did that practice spread across the globe? How has technology changed its rhythms and rituals? And what do we actually know about how well it works?

• 2. From Parlors to Public Spaces

  ›

  Victorian courtship in the mid-1800s through World War I looked nothing like what Ade was describing. Among the middle and upper classes, romantic interaction happened under parental supervision inside the home. Working-class couples had smaller living spaces and less privacy, so they met in restaurants, dances, and theatres instead. Those public outings created something genuinely new: a planned social meeting between potential romantic partners who were not yet chaperoned. That shift from supervised domestic courtship to unsupervised leisure encounters gave rise to the modern concept of a date.

  The term and practice spread beyond the English-speaking world through cultural exchange, colonisation, and mass media. In Japan, the word deeto was borrowed phonetically from English during the Taishō period, spanning 1912 to 1926, as marriage practices shifted from the traditional omiai system of formal, facilitated introductions toward individual choice and romantic love. In China, the term yuēhuì adopted romantic meaning in the early 20th century under Western influence. In Arabic-speaking societies, romantic interaction before marriage had traditionally occurred within tightly regulated frameworks such as khitbah, or formal engagement, and family-arranged meetings. The borrowed term daiting, along with variants such as diting and dāyteng, entered colloquial usage, typically referring to informal cross-gender interactions that echoed Western-style dating while remaining distinct from family-mediated courtship. Japan's omiai matchmaking custom, which involves formal meetings with both families and a matchmaker present, persisted alongside these newer forms, though the rate of people meeting partners through traditional means has declined steadily since around 2013.

• 3. The Machine as Matchmaker

  ›

  In Newark, New Jersey, in 1941, a statistics-based dating service opened that used data from forms filled out by customers, making it one of the earliest recorded examples of systematic matchmaking by data. The Scientific Marriage Foundation, established in 1957 by Dr. George W. Crane, processed applicants' forms through an IBM card sorting machine. Neither of these is the service most people remember, however.

  The earliest commercially successful computerized dating service in either the US or the UK was Com-Pat, started by Joan Ball in 1964. Operation Match, launched a year later by Harvard University students, is often erroneously called the first computerized dating service. Both Ball and the founders of Operation Match acknowledged that European computer dating services preceded theirs and served as their inspiration. The longest-running and most financially successful early computer dating business was Dateline, started in the UK in 1965 by John Patterson. Patterson's business model was not fully legal. He was charged with fraud on several occasions for selling lists of women who signed up for his service to men seeking prostitutes. Dateline continued until Patterson's death from alcoholism in 1997, and during the early 1990s it was reported to be the most profitable computer dating company in the world. In the early 1980s in New York City, software developers wrote algorithms to match singles romantically, sometimes using collaborative filtering technologies. That thread leads directly to what Aziz Ansari reported in Modern Romance: An Investigation, that one third of marriages in the United States between 2005 and 2012 met through online dating services.

• 4. Online, On Camera, On Speed

  ›

  Contemporary online dating began in the mid-1990s with websites, followed by mobile apps in the 2010s. About 30% of Americans report using a dating site. Platforms introduced geolocation-based matching, algorithmic recommendations, and swipe interfaces; apps such as Grindr and Tinder allow a user to accept or reject another user with a single swipe. Bumble enforced until 2024 the norm that heterosexual women send the first message after matching. The online dating industry was a two billion dollar per year business, with an annual growth rate of 5%, dominated by a few large companies including EHarmony, Zoosk, and InterActiveCorp, which owns brands including Match.com and OkCupid.

  During the COVID-19 pandemic, dating apps integrated in-app video and voice features to support real-time interactions at a distance. Virtual dating shifted early romantic encounters from public spaces to private homes and blended online interaction with tools such as Zoom, WhatsApp, FaceTime, and Google Hangouts. Researchers suggest these practices are likely to persist well beyond the pandemic.

  Speed dating, originating in the late 1990s, took a different structural approach: a series of short timed conversations often lasting 3 to 8 minutes with multiple potential partners, typically allowing participants to meet up to 20 people in a single session. Critics noted that the format can resemble a beauty contest, where more physically attractive participants receive the majority of offers while personality and intelligence may be overlooked in shorter sessions. A 2005 Pew Research survey of 3,215 adults estimated that three million Americans had entered long-term relationships or marriage after meeting on a dating website.

• 5. Distance, Timing, and Commitment

  ›

  Long-distance dating research produces some counterintuitive findings. Studies indicate that long-distance partners often report levels of relationship satisfaction and stability comparable to, or even higher than, geographically close couples, partly because their communication tends to be more deliberate and self-disclosing. Research comparing the two groups found that long-distance partners often engage in greater idealization and report higher satisfaction with relationship communication, attributed to greater effort put into it.

  About half of long-distance couples eventually reunite. Roughly one-third of those reunited relationships end within three months of reunion. The transition brings changes including reduced autonomy, time management difficulties, and increased conflict, as partners adjust to daily proximity and lose some of the novelty and independence characteristic of long-distance relationships.

  The question of when to pursue commitment intersects with career timing in contested ways. Danielle Crittenden in What Our Mothers Didn't Tell Us argued that having both a career and family simultaneously was taxing and stressful for a woman, and suggested women should date in their early twenties with a seriousness of purpose, marry when their relative beauty permitted finding a reliable partner, have children, then return to work in their early thirties with kids in school. Crittenden acknowledged that splitting a career with a ten-year baby-raising hiatus posed difficulties. Economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett in 2002 found that 55% of 35-year-old career women were childless, while 19% of male corporate executives were. A 2018 study in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence found that serious dating among teenagers can have negative effects on mood, attributed to incomplete cognitive and emotional development that limits the ability to handle the challenging aspects of romantic relationships.

• 6. Norms, Violence, and Ongoing Debates

  ›

  Online dating patterns suggest that men initiate online exchanges more than 75% of the time. Evolutionary psychology suggests that women are the more selective gender in mate selection because reproduction is a larger investment for women. Women's endorsement of gendered dating norms tends to increase with benevolent sexism and preference for dominant men. Some women report privately playing a decisive role in the timing of a marriage proposal while publicly following gendered courtship conventions.

  In countries where women now show on average higher educational attainment than men, such as parts of Europe and the United States, a switch in educational hypergamy from men to women was observed in heterosexual couples. The 1995 book The Rules touched off media controversy about how men and women should relate to each other, drawing responses from columnist Maureen Dowd of The New York Times and British writer Kira Cochrane of The Guardian, among others. Anthropologist Helen Fisher suggested that dating is a game designed to impress and capture, oriented around novelty, excitement, and even danger, which can boost dopamine levels.

  Dating violence remains a persistent concern. A 2004 estimate was that 20% of US high school girls aged 14 to 18 had been hit, slapped, shoved, or forced into sexual activity. Several studies suggest that 12% to 15% of men and 21% to 40% of women have been involved in some form of dating or courtship violence. Sara McCorquodale suggests that women meeting strangers on dates meet initially in busy public places, share details of upcoming dates with friends or family, and avoid revealing surnames or addresses. A research study published in 2025 found no evidence for the stereotype that people who engage in casual sex, particularly women, have lower self-esteem than those who report only committed sexual relationships, offering one small empirical counter to long-standing assumptions about casual dating.