Curtailment (electricity)
In Cyprus in 2025, curtailment claimed almost half of large-scale solar power before it could reach any home. Grid operators issued the order to keep the electricity system stable. Curtailment is an involuntary reduction in a power plant's output; the industry calls it "dispatching down." Grid operators have used the technique throughout the history of electric power production. In the 21st century, though, curtailment has become a pressing economic problem for owners of wind and solar plants. Understanding why starts with a fundamental difference between renewable power and everything that came before it.
A conventional plant ordered to reduce output at least saves on the fuel it would otherwise burn. Wind turbines and solar panels have no such offset. The wind keeps blowing; the panels keep absorbing sunlight. No fuel expense is avoided when a renewable generator is told to stop.
Variable renewable energy plants carry quite low marginal production costs precisely because they burn nothing. When they are ordered to dispatch down, they lose revenue without saving any comparable expense. This makes curtailment a far more damaging event for a renewable plant than for a conventional one.
Power purchase agreements, the contracts guaranteeing operators a set price for each unit delivered, are at risk when curtailment becomes routine. A plant that delivers less than its contracted volume faces commercial consequences that extend far beyond any single lost hour. The scale of those losses has grown as renewable energy has spread to every corner of the globe.
In western China in 2018, around 20 percent of wind power was curtailed before it could reach any user. On the island of Maui in Hawaii, curtailment reached 20 percent in the second and third quarters of 2020.
Ireland recorded a loss of 1.2 terawatt-hours of wind power in 2022. The United Kingdom curtailed 1.35 terawatt-hours of wind in early 2023. Australia lost 4.5 terawatt-hours of solar and wind power across 2024.
Spain's record from October 2022 to September 2024 shows 2.9 percent of solar power curtailed. Greece discarded 0.9 terawatt-hours in 2024, then 2 terawatt-hours of green power in 2025. California tells a story of its own, where the time of day matters as much as the volume of generation.
California's grid curtailed 460 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2018, a figure that looked modest at just 0.2 percent of total generation. It did not stay modest.
By 2020-2021, monthly curtailment in California had climbed to 150-300 gigawatt-hours. By 2024-2025, the monthly figure ranged from 500-700 gigawatt-hours, with spring months driving most of that volume. The state had added solar capacity faster than demand could absorb it.
The pattern behind this surge is called the duck curve. At noon on a spring day, solar generation peaks while overall electricity demand holds relatively flat. The grid floods with power it has nowhere to send. California deployed 11 gigawatts of battery capacity to time-shift some of that surplus. Yet the midday problem persists, and solving it at scale requires more than storage alone.
In 2013, ERCOT completed a transmission line from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone in West Texas to the central cities of the Texas Interconnection. Curtailment in that corridor fell from 8-16 percent to near zero. Transmission upgrades are one of four approaches grid operators can use to reduce curtailment.
Better forecasting for electricity prices, wind, and solar output helps operators anticipate imbalances before a curtailment order becomes necessary. Demand response programs shift electricity consumption toward periods when generation is high. Increased energy storage captures surplus for later delivery. Together, these tools can reduce curtailment or avoid it completely.
Using all available energy can require methods as costly as building new power lines or adding storage capacity. When those costs exceed the value of the electricity being saved, operators may find it cheaper to let the surplus go. That calculation will grow harder to avoid as renewable generation continues to expand across every major grid.
Updated
Common questions
What is electricity curtailment and why does it happen?
Electricity curtailment is an involuntary reduction in a power plant's output, ordered by grid operators to maintain stability when generation exceeds demand. The practice, sometimes called "dispatching down," has been used throughout the history of electric power production. In the 21st century it has become a significant economic issue for owners of wind and solar plants.
Why does electricity curtailment affect wind and solar plants more than conventional power plants?
Wind and solar plants burn no fuel, so their marginal cost of production is very low. When curtailment forces a conventional plant to reduce output, it at least saves on fuel. Renewable plants lose the same revenue but save almost nothing on operating expenses, making curtailment disproportionately damaging to their economics.
Which regions have the highest electricity curtailment rates?
Cyprus curtailed almost half of its distributed large-scale solar power in 2025. Western China recorded around 20 percent curtailment for wind power in 2018, and the island of Maui in Hawaii reached a similar 20 percent in the second and third quarters of 2020.
How much electricity has been curtailed in California and why has it grown?
California curtailed 460 gigawatt-hours in 2018, equal to 0.2 percent of total generation. Monthly curtailment grew to 150-300 gigawatt-hours in 2020-2021, then to 500-700 gigawatt-hours by 2024-2025, driven mainly by solar overproduction in spring.
What is the duck curve and how does it cause electricity curtailment?
The duck curve is a pattern where solar power peaks at noon while overall electricity demand remains relatively flat, creating a surplus the grid cannot absorb. In California, curtailment occurs mainly at noon and mainly in spring because of this midday solar surge.
How did ERCOT reduce electricity curtailment in West Texas?
In 2013, ERCOT completed a transmission line from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone in West Texas to the central cities of the Texas Interconnection. Curtailment in that corridor fell from a range of 8-16 percent to near zero.
All sources
24 references cited across the entry
- 1How to Manage Curtailment in a Virtual Power Purchase Agreement13 February 2019
- 2Do Preventative Blackouts Put California's Renewable Generators at Risk?Jeff St. John — 26 November 2019
- 3Renewable Energy Curtailment 101: The Problem That's Actually Not a Problem At AllMark Specht — 25 June 2019
- 4Curtailment: losing green powerDave Elliott — 10 July 2019
- 8China's Ambitious Plan to Build the World's Biggest SupergridPeter Fairley — 21 February 2019
- 9Pumped Energy Storage: Vital to California's Renewable Energy FutureDavid G. Victor — 21 May 2019
- 11An $11 trillion global hydrogen energy boom is coming. Here's what could trigger itTim Hornyak — 1 November 2020
- 13California solar curtailment down 12% on back of batteriesJohn Fitzgerald Weaver — 23 July 2025
- 16Wind-rich Ireland 'could make Europe's cheapest green hydrogen'Rachel Parkes — 8 March 2023
- 17Orsted, Highview Power sign storage pact6 April 2023
- 19Batteries with 200 Wh storage per kW of solar capacity could mitigate curtailment in SpainPilar Sanchez Molina — 1 July 2025
- 21Cyprus solar curtailment hits 47% in 2025Ilias Tsagas — 13 January 2026
- 22BookProceedings of the 2015 ACM Sixth International Conference on Future Energy SystemsCharalampos Chelmis et al. — 14 July 2015
- 23Electric Ridesharing Benefits the Grid, and EVgo Has the Data to Prove ItJulia Pyper — 9 May 2019
- 24JournalMitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data CentersJiajia Zheng et al. — October 2020