HearLore
ListenSearchLibrary

Follow the threads

Every story connects to a hundred more

Topics
  • Browse all topics
  • Featured
  • Recently added
Categories
  • Browse all categories
  • For you
Answers
  • All answer pages
Journal
  • All entries
  • RSS feed
Terms of service·Privacy policy

2026 HearLore

Preview of HearLore

Free to follow every thread. No paywall, no dead ends.

ListenSearchLibrary

Adapted from Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Modified for audio. This HearLore entry is also licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

— Ch. 1 · Origins And Entry Into Force —

Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.

~2 min read · Ch. 1 of 5
The United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons concluded its negotiations in Geneva on the 10th of October 1980. It entered into force three years later on the 2nd of December 1983. This treaty sought to prohibit or restrict weapons deemed excessively injurious or indiscriminate. By the end of July 2024, 128 state parties had joined the agreement. Some nations adopted only two of the five protocols as a minimum requirement for participation. The full title describes the scope: restrictions on weapons causing excessive injury or indiscriminate effects.

The Five Regulatory Protocols

Protocol I prohibits weapons using fragments undetectable by X-rays within the human body. Such fragments cause unnecessary suffering because they are difficult to remove surgically. Protocol II regulates landmines and booby traps without issuing a total ban. It forbids non-detectable anti-personnel mines and their transfer between states. Protocol III bans incendiary weapons designed primarily to set fire to objects or cause burn injuries through chemical reactions. Air-delivered incendiaries cannot target military objectives inside civilian concentrations under this protocol. Forests may not be targeted unless used to conceal combatants or other military goals. Protocol IV outlaws laser weapons specifically designed to cause permanent blindness. Parties must take feasible precautions to avoid incidental blinding from other laser systems. Protocol V requires clearance of unexploded ordnance after active hostilities cease. States that used explosive weapons must assist in clearing the resulting debris.

Continue Browsing

1980 in SwitzerlandInternational humanitarian law treatiesMine actionTreaties concluded in 1980Treaties concluded in GenevaTreaties entered into force in 1983Treaties extended to GreenlandTreaties extended to the Caribbean NetherlandsTreaties extended to the Faroe IslandsTreaties of AlbaniaTreaties of AlgeriaTreaties of Antigua and BarbudaTreaties of ArgentinaTreaties of AustraliaTreaties of AustriaTreaties of BahrainTreaties of BangladeshTreaties of BelgiumTreaties of BoliviaTreaties of Bosnia and HerzegovinaTreaties of Brazil

Common questions

When did the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons enter into force?

The United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons entered into force on the 2nd of December 1983. The negotiations concluded in Geneva on the 10th of October 1980, and the treaty became effective three years later.

How many state parties joined the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons by July 2024?

By the end of July 2024, 128 state parties had joined the agreement. Some nations adopted only two of the five protocols as a minimum requirement for participation.

What does Protocol IV of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons prohibit?

Protocol IV outlaws laser weapons specifically designed to cause permanent blindness. Parties must take feasible precautions to avoid incidental blinding from other laser systems.

When did the amendment to Protocol II of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons enter into force?

The significant amendment to Protocol II entered into force on the 3rd of December 1998. This update extended restrictions on landmine use to cover internal armed conflicts as well as international ones.

Why has the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons failed to adopt a compliance mechanism?

Negotiations failed to achieve consensus on adding a compliance mechanism because China and Russia opposed restrictions requiring anti-vehicle mines to self-deactivate. These diplomatic hurdles prevented stronger enforcement measures from being adopted during that period.

See all questions about Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons →

In this section

Loading sources

All sources

 

Amendments To Mine Regulations

A significant amendment to Protocol II occurred on the 3rd of May 1996. This update extended restrictions on landmine use to cover internal armed conflicts as well as international ones. The revised text established reliability standards for remotely delivered mines. It prohibited the use of non-detectable fragments in anti-personnel landmines. The amendment entered into force on the 3rd of December 1998. Failure to agree on a total ban led to the separate Ottawa Treaty. The updated protocol also broadened obligations regarding peacekeeping missions of the United Nations. States were required to enforce compliance within their jurisdiction and impose penal sanctions for violations.

Enforcement And Compliance Gaps

The convention lacks any formal verification mechanism to ensure parties honor their commitments. No process exists for resolving disputes over compliance concerns between member states. A state party can refuse its commitment but remains legally bound until one year after notifying the UN Secretary-General. The treaty depositary receives this notification of intent to withdraw from obligations. As of 2017, negotiations failed to achieve consensus on adding a compliance mechanism. China and Russia opposed restrictions requiring anti-vehicle mines to self-deactivate. These diplomatic hurdles prevented stronger enforcement measures from being adopted during that period.

Modern Negotiations On Autonomy

Talks opened in the 2010s regarding restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Most major powers opposed an international ban on such technology as of 2021. The CCW has struggled to reach agreement on regulating these emerging weapon types. Diplomatic efforts continue despite significant opposition from key military nations. The lack of consensus reflects deep divisions over how autonomy should be regulated in warfare. Future negotiations will likely face similar challenges given current geopolitical stances.
Treaties of Burkina Faso
Treaties of Burundi
Treaties of Cambodia
Treaties of Cameroon
Treaties of Canada
Treaties of Cape Verde
Treaties of Chile
Treaties of Colombia
Treaties of Costa Rica
Treaties of Croatia
Treaties of Cuba
Treaties of Cyprus
Treaties of Czechoslovakia
Treaties of Denmark
Treaties of Djibouti
Treaties of East Germany
Treaties of Ecuador
Treaties of El Salvador
Treaties of Estonia
Treaties of Finland
Treaties of France
Treaties of Gabon
Treaties of Georgia (country)
Treaties of Germany
Treaties of Greece
Treaties of Grenada
Treaties of Guatemala
Treaties of Guinea-Bissau
Treaties of Honduras
Treaties of Iceland
Treaties of India
Treaties of Iraq
Treaties of Ireland
Treaties of Israel
Treaties of Italy
Treaties of Ivory Coast
Treaties of Jamaica
Treaties of Japan
Treaties of Jordan
Treaties of Kazakhstan
Treaties of Kuwait
Treaties of Laos
Treaties of Latvia
Treaties of Lesotho
Treaties of Liberia
Treaties of Liechtenstein
Treaties of Lithuania
Treaties of Luxembourg
Treaties of Madagascar
Treaties of Mali
Treaties of Malta
Treaties of Mauritius
Treaties of Mexico
Treaties of Moldova
Treaties of Monaco
Treaties of Montenegro
Treaties of Morocco
Treaties of Nauru
Treaties of New Zealand
Treaties of Nicaragua
Treaties of Niger
Treaties of North Macedonia
Treaties of Norway
Treaties of Pakistan
Treaties of Palestine
Treaties of Panama
Treaties of Paraguay
Treaties of Peru
Treaties of Portugal
Treaties of Qatar
Treaties of Romania
Treaties of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Treaties of Saudi Arabia
Treaties of Senegal
Treaties of Serbia and Montenegro
Treaties of Seychelles
Treaties of Sierra Leone
Treaties of Slovakia
Treaties of Slovenia
Treaties of South Africa
Treaties of South Korea
Treaties of Spain
Treaties of Sri Lanka
Treaties of Sweden
Treaties of Switzerland
Treaties of Tajikistan
Treaties of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic
Treaties of the Czech Republic
Treaties of the Dominican Republic
Treaties of the Holy See
Treaties of the Hungarian People's Republic
Treaties of the Maldives
Treaties of the Mongolian People's Republic
Treaties of the Netherlands
Treaties of the People's Republic of Benin
Treaties of the People's Republic of Bulgaria
Treaties of the People's Republic of China
Treaties of the Philippines
Treaties of the Polish People's Republic
Treaties of the Soviet Union
Treaties of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic
Treaties of the United Arab Emirates
Treaties of the United Kingdom
Treaties of the United States
Treaties of Togo
Treaties of Tunisia
Treaties of Turkey
Treaties of Turkmenistan
Treaties of Uganda
Treaties of Uruguay
Treaties of Uzbekistan
Treaties of Venezuela
Treaties of Yugoslavia
Treaties of Zambia
United Nations treaties