Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  On the 1st of August 1975, thirty-five heads of state gathered at Finlandia Hall in Helsinki to sign a document that carried no legal force of a treaty, yet would quietly unsettle one of the most powerful political systems in history. The Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe, known as the CSCE, was born from a Cold War standoff and shaped by years of painstaking diplomacy. At its heart was a paradox: the Soviet Union signed it expecting to benefit, and for years it seemed they were right. What changed? And how did a diplomatic forum with no binding power manage to contribute to the erosion of totalitarian rule across Eastern Europe?

  The answers begin not in Moscow or Washington but in Helsinki, where Finland made a decision that would put a small Nordic nation at the center of the Cold War's most consequential negotiation.

• 2. Finland's Calculated Gamble

  ›

  President Urho Kekkonen understood the risks before anyone else did. Finland had watched the Soviet Union's Warsaw Pact forces occupy Czechoslovakia in 1968, an event that shook European confidence in the stability of the postwar order. Kekkonen drew on an earlier crisis, the note crisis of autumn 1961, when militarily charged political tension in Central Europe had directly threatened Finland's position. He concluded that a real negotiating forum, not a propaganda exercise, could help Europe recover from the shock.

  Finland's proposal differed from the Soviet version in three important ways. It did not require recognition of two Germanys as a threshold for holding the conference, it included the United States and Canada as participants, and it offered Helsinki as the host city. Finland held a distinctive advantage in these diplomatics: unlike other Western-adjacent states, it had not formally recognized either Germany, managing its relations with both Germanies at arm's length and with a deliberately low profile.

  The Finnish initiative met a lukewarm reception in the West. NATO generally held that the conference could not succeed until the German question was resolved. By the end of August 1969, twenty countries had replied positively to the invitation. The sole absolute refusal came from Albania, which the source describes as China's ally and its European mouthpiece. The picture began to shift in October 1969, when Willy Brandt became Chancellor of West Germany. In February 1970, Kekkonen appointed Ralph Enckell, Finland's ambassador to Stockholm, as a travelling ambassador tasked with keeping in contact with invited governments and gathering information to prepare the ground.

• 3. Three Phases, One Document

  ›

  The security conference unfolded in three distinct phases spread across two years. The first was held at the foreign minister level at Finlandia Hall in Helsinki from the 3rd to the 7th of July 1973. Foreign Minister Ahti Karjalainen hosted the meeting, which was also attended by UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim. No political decisions were taken; the phase was designed to consolidate the results of preparatory meetings held in Dipoli, Espoo since November 1972, and to map the architecture of the negotiations to come.

  Karjalainen, reflecting on the atmosphere at that gathering, described a special quality he called the "Spirit of Helsinki." The second phase moved to Geneva, where negotiations ran from September 1973 until the spring of 1975. The most stubborn obstacle in Geneva was the free movement of people and knowledge. The Eastern Bloc regarded this as an ideological threat. Agreement proved possible, however, on non-interference in the internal affairs of states, the inviolability of borders, and a framework for economic, scientific, and cultural cooperation.

  The negotiating climate in Geneva cooled further in February 1974, when the Soviet Union expelled Nobel Prize-winner Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. The slow pace of talks threatened to push the third phase, the summit, beyond Helsinki's capacity to arrange on the original schedule. Only after Soviet concessions did the summit proceed as planned. Before traveling to Helsinki, US President Gerald Ford held a meeting with Eastern European-Americans in which he firmly declared that the United States would not alter its political stance on the situation of the Baltic states.

• 4. Thirty-Five at Finlandia Hall

  ›

  The summit at the end of July and the beginning of August 1975 brought together a roster of leaders that read as a precise map of Cold War Europe. Agostino Casaroli, Cardinal Secretary of State of the Holy See, opened the final phase and chaired it. Leonid Brezhnev represented the Soviet Union, Gerald Ford the United States, Pierre Trudeau Canada, and Harold Wilson the United Kingdom.

  One moment stood apart from all the formal ceremony. For the first time, the heads of state of West and East Germany, Helmut Schmidt and Erich Honecker, sat at the same table in Helsinki. Every European country attended except Albania and Andorra, though France's Valery Giscard d'Estaing, who was technically Co-Prince of Andorra, attended with no mention of that role in the declaration.

  The signing of the Helsinki Accords on the 1st of August followed a specific symbolic order: Chancellor Schmidt signed first and Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito signed last. The final document was divided into four sections. The first addressed European security; the second covered cooperation in economy, science, and environmental protection; the third dealt with humanitarian cooperation; and the fourth set out arrangements for follow-up meetings. Ramiz Alia of Albania, who had refused to attend in 1975, eventually signed the accord in Helsinki on the 16th of September 1991.

• 5. The Quiet Undermining

  ›

  The Soviet leadership believed they had gained the most from the accords. The first section ratified the integrity of state boundaries established by the Second World War and the 1947 Paris Peace Treaty, which the Soviet Union had long sought as formal recognition of its postwar territorial gains. Soviet leaders also expected much from the economic cooperation provisions of the second section, though in practice those arrangements remained largely formal, stalled by the gap between western market economies and eastern planned economies.

  The general expectation at the time was that the Helsinki Conference would mark a conclusion to the Cold War. Instead, tensions between East and West sharpened shortly afterward. The Cold War expanded in the second half of the 1970s into third world countries, and by the early 1980s Europe was in a spiral of missile armament between NATO and the Warsaw Pact.

  Jimmy Carter, who succeeded Gerald Ford, made human rights a central objective of American foreign policy. This produced direct clashes with the Soviet Union at the CSCE follow-up meetings, the first of which took place in Belgrade in 1977, and the next in Madrid beginning in 1979. When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, the CSCE seemed to fade into irrelevance. Reagan distanced himself from the process on the grounds that it legitimized Soviet control over Eastern Europe. After the Soviet Union broke apart, however, a different interpretation took hold: the third section of the accords, with its humanitarian commitments, had quietly worked to undermine the totalitarian system from within.

• 6. A Nation's Neutrality Confirmed

  ›

  The international press adopted the phrase "spirit of Helsinki" in the aftermath of the summit, and the term detente became widely associated with the CSCE process. For Finland, the consequences were more concrete and lasting. Foreign participants in the CSCE recognized Helsinki as neutral ground, and Finland used this recognition to reinforce its position of neutrality in subsequent years.

  The 10th anniversary meeting, held again at Finlandia Hall at the end of July and beginning of August 1985, illustrated how much the international climate had changed. Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze criticized the United States for its resistance to an arms limitation treaty. US Secretary of State George Shultz responded by listing by name specific cases in which he considered the Soviet Union to have violated human rights. Finnish President Mauno Koivisto met individually with both Shultz and Shevardnadze, as well as other foreign ministers attending. The meeting ended with no document signed.

  By 1992, the accords had attracted a wave of new signatories: leaders of the former Soviet republics of Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan signed in February of that year. At the 1992 follow-up meeting in Helsinki, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan all joined. In 1994, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe was formally established as the CSCE's successor, carrying forward the process that had begun with Finland's proposal in 1969.