— Ch. 1 · The 1876 Election Crisis —
Compromise of 1877.
~5 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
On the morning of the 2nd of March 1877, President pro tempore Thomas W. Ferry announced that Rutherford B. Hayes had been elected president by an electoral margin of 110 to 120. The previous November, Samuel J. Tilden had secured 184 uncontested electoral votes while Hayes held only 165. A total of 20 electoral votes from Florida, Louisiana, Oregon, and South Carolina remained disputed. Congress passed the Electoral Commission Act to resolve these disputes without a clear constitutional directive. This act established a fifteen-member commission with eight Republicans and seven Democrats. The commission voted eight to seven along party lines to certify each disputed vote in favor of Hayes. Democratic Representatives in the House resorted to dilatory tactics by raising spurious objections to electors from Vermont and Wisconsin. Speaker of the House Samuel J. Randall refused to entertain the dilatory motions. At 4:10 am on March 2, the Senate declared Hayes the winner. No armed units marched on Washington despite talk of forming them.
Secret Negotiations And Wormley Hotel
Historian C. Vann Woodward reconstructed a version of events where Southern Democrats met secretly at Wormley's Hotel in Washington. Emerging business interests of the New South found common ground with Republican businessmen, particularly regarding railroads. Thomas A. Scott of the Pennsylvania Railroad initiated negotiations resulting in the final compromise. These meetings aimed to forge an agreement involving aid for internal improvements like bridges, canals, and railroads desired by the South. Contemporary accounts lack any discussion of backroom negotiations during the crisis. Neither Abram Hewitt's papers nor a 1901 history written by Milton H. Northrup mentions such a deal. Henry Watterson recounted a White House dinner during the Grover Cleveland administration where four unnamed insiders attempted to reveal secrets. Watterson concluded that the whole truth would never be known. Despite the lack of solid contemporary accounts, the story of a Bargain of 1877 gradually came to explain how Southern Democrats recognized Hayes's authority.