Catiline

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Catiline - or Lucius Sergius Catilina, as Rome knew him - died in the winter of 62 BC with his face turned toward the enemy and his body found far in advance of his fallen soldiers. When the battle outside Pistoria was over, the republican forces surveying the field noticed something remarkable: nearly every rebel soldier had fallen in the spot he had occupied at the start of the fight, wounds to the front. Their commander lay among a heap of slain enemies, still breathing slightly, his expression unchanged from the resolve that had driven the whole catastrophe.

  How a patrician of ancient Roman lineage, a man who had served the state as praetor and provincial governor, came to die leading a rebel army against that same state is a story of ambition, legal persecution, electoral humiliation, and the grinding social pressures of a republic pulling itself apart. Was Catiline the monster Cicero painted in four thundering speeches still read today? A genuine reformer crushed by a corrupt elite? Or something more complicated - a man shaped by the same brutal politics he tried to overthrow? Those questions have never fully been settled.

• 2. A Family on the Margins

  ›

  The gens Sergia traced its bloodline to Sergestus, a Trojan companion of Aeneas - an origin story so ancient it belonged to myth. Yet by the time Catiline was born, around 108 BC, the Sergii had not held the consulship since the second consulship of Gnaeus Sergius Fidenas Coxo in 429 BC. The last Sergius to even serve as a consular tribune had done so in 380 BC. By Roman reckoning, this was a family with illustrious ancestors and a long recent silence.

  Catiline's father, Lucius Sergius Silus, was poor by aristocratic standards. His maternal uncle served as praetor in 105 BC. Further back, his great-grandfather Marcus Sergius Silus had served with distinction as praetor during the Second Punic War in 197 BC. The family had martial credit going deep into Rome's past. What it lacked was modern political traction.

  This gap between patrician pedigree and actual influence would define Catiline's entire career. He possessed the birth-right to reach the highest offices of the Roman state, but the connections and money to get there had to be built from scratch - and Catiline, as events would show, was willing to build them through whatever means were available. His first wife was Gratidia, one of the nieces of Gaius Marius - a calculated connection to the populist faction that had dominated Rome before Sulla's dictatorship overturned everything.

• 3. Sulla's Shadow

  ›

  In 82 BC, Catiline joined the Sullan side during Sulla's civil war and served as a lieutenant. What followed would mark him for the rest of his life. During the Sullan proscriptions, Catiline allegedly profited by killing his own brother and two of his brothers-in-law. Cicero later accused him of helping Quintus Lutatius Catulus avenge himself upon Catiline's wife's brother, Marcus Marius Gratidianus - a man whose prosecution had caused the death of Catulus' father.

  Cicero's version of events, given in a campaign speech attacking Catiline as a rival candidate, described Catiline beheading Gratidianus and carrying the head through the city from the Janiculum to Sulla at the Temple of Apollo. Later sources elaborated still further. Some modern historians, however, regard this account as Ciceronean political slander, placing the primary blame for Gratidianus' death on Catulus himself and doubting Catiline's role went beyond a supporting part.

  What is not in doubt is the financial outcome. Catiline engaged in profiteering from the proscriptions, likely purchasing confiscated estates at fractions of their true value. By the end of Sulla's dictatorship, he had become a rich man. That wealth, built on the blood and dispossession of Sulla's enemies, would eventually fund his political ambitions - and the memory of how it was acquired would be used against him at every turn. In 73 BC, he faced prosecution before a panel of pontiffs for alleged adultery with a Vestal Virgin named Fabia, a half-sister of Cicero's wife Terentia. Conviction would have meant execution for sacrilege. His friend Catulus, who presided over the court, helped secure an acquittal - placing Catiline firmly in that man's debt.

• 4. The Consulship Denied

  ›

  When Catiline returned to Rome from his governorship of Africa in 66 BC, embassies from that province were already waiting to protest his conduct there. A corruption trial loomed. His attempt to stand for the consulship that year was rejected by the presiding magistrate before it could begin.

  The trial that followed was prosecuted by Publius Clodius Pulcher, but a parade of former consuls came to Catiline's defence - a pattern that would repeat throughout his legal troubles. The jury divided along social lines: senators voted for conviction; the other two panels, composed of equites and the tribuni aerarii, voted to acquit. Catiline walked free.

  At the consular elections in 64 BC, three candidates dominated: Catiline, Cicero, and Gaius Antonius Hybrida. Catiline was bankrolled by Caesar and Crassus and distributed substantial bribes. He and Antonius were allies and worked together against Cicero. The strategy failed. Cicero was elected unanimously; Antonius narrowly beat Catiline into second place. Catiline was left out entirely.

  That same year, Gaius Julius Caesar presided over the standing court on assassinations, and Cato the Younger was pressing in the treasury for repayment of loans from the civil wars - both moves that threatened men who had benefited from Sulla's regime. Catiline's maternal uncle was convicted of murder during the proscriptions around this time, which may have swayed voters further against him. Catiline himself faced fresh murder charges, possibly relating to Gratidianus, and was acquitted again when former consuls spoke on his behalf. Then, for the consular elections of 63 BC, he stood a third time - and lost again, to Decimus Junius Silanus and Lucius Licinius Murena.

• 5. The Conspiracy Takes Shape

  ›

  The year 63 BC was not a year built for civil harmony. A proposal to redistribute land - which might have eased real hardship among Rome's dispossessed poor - came before the plebs and was killed in part through Cicero's opposition. A trial touching on the senate's right to declare emergency powers sent signals through the political class. A later proposal to restore the rights of men disenfranchised by Sulla's proscriptions was also defeated. Each failure, according to the sources, drove more desperate men toward Catiline.

  On the 6th of November, Catiline held a secret meeting at the house of Marcus Porcius Laeca. He planned to travel north to join the army that an ex-Sullan centurion named Gaius Manlius had raised in Etruria. Conspirators in Rome would set fires, take charge of revolts elsewhere in Italy, and send two men to assassinate Cicero the following morning. On the 7th of November, the assassins arrived at Cicero's house and found it shut against them.

  Cicero convened the senate at the Temple of Jupiter Stator and delivered the First Catilinarian - one of the most famous speeches in Latin literature. Catiline, already planning to leave, offered to go into exile if the senate decreed it. When Cicero declined to put the motion, Catiline insulted him, calling him a squatter on Roman soil, then departed the city - claiming publicly that he was heading to voluntary exile at Massilia to spare Rome a civil war. Before he left, he wrote a letter to his old ally Quintus Lutatius Catulus Capitolinus defending himself as an injured man who had taken up the cause of the less fortunate in keeping with his patrician ancestors' custom. He denied that debts had driven him and asked Catulus to care for his wife Orestilla. Instead of the road to Massilia, he took the road to Etruria, collected weapons from a cache, and joined Manlius' forces at Faesulae, where he proclaimed himself consul and took up consular regalia.

• 6. The Battle of Pistoria

  ›

  With Antonius' army closing from the south and Quintus Caecilius Metellus Celer garrisoning the Apennine passes near Bononia to the north, Catiline's options collapsed in December of 63 BC. When news reached his camp that his coconspirators in Rome had been executed without trial on the 5th of December - after a fierce senate debate - much of his army melted away. He was left with perhaps a few more than three thousand men.

  Antionus had been receiving reinforcements, including men sent by then-quaestor Publius Sestius in the final days of December. In early January 62 BC, Catiline descended from the heights near Pistoria - the modern city of Pistoia in Tuscany - and offered battle. Antonius, reportedly stricken with gout, handed operational command to Marcus Petreius, an experienced lieutenant. Petreius broke through the Catilinarian centre with the praetorian cohort and drove the rebels into flight.

  Catiline and his diehard supporters fought to the end. Sallust, in his account of the battle, recorded that when the fighting was over, nearly every rebel lay in the exact position he had held at the start, his wounds to the front. Catiline himself was found deep among the enemy dead, still breathing slightly, his face showing what Sallust called the indomitable spirit that had animated him in life. He was killed and his army annihilated. The man who had proclaimed himself consul in a field in Etruria was buried in that same Tuscan soil.

• 7. How History Remembered Him

  ›

  Sallust's monograph Bellum Catilinae, written around the time of the Second Triumvirate, shaped how later generations read Catiline. Sallust painted him as a symbol of the Roman Republic's moral decline - a "through-going villain, the product of the corrupt age, who was bent on the destruction of the state from the very beginning." His phrase for Catiline's character, vastus animus - a ravaged mind - stuck. Virgil placed Catiline in the underworld in the Aeneid, tortured by the Furies during the reign of Augustus.

  Yet a contradictory current ran alongside the official condemnation. Cicero himself, in a defence speech for Marcus Caelius Rufus, praised Catiline as a good motivator, effective general, and sociable man - reasons, he argued, that explained why so many had been willing to follow him. Into the imperial period, Catiline's name was hurled as an insult at unpopular emperors. In Tuscany, a mediaeval tradition held that Catiline had survived the battle and lived out his days as a local hero; another version gave him a son, Uberto, ancestor of the Uberti dynasty in Florence.

  The first major modern reassessment came from Edward Spencer Beesly in 1878, who argued against the prevailing image of Catiline as a demon luring weak men to damnation. Later scholars went further: one depicted the entire conspiracy as largely a Ciceronean fiction constructed to advance Cicero's political career; another argued the senate deliberately incited the crisis to purge Italy of men who might rally to Pompey on his return from the Third Mithridatic War. The literary record, overwhelmingly filtered through Cicero and his allies, makes these defences difficult to verify.

  Dramatists and novelists have returned to Catiline repeatedly. Ben Jonson wrote Catiline His Conspiracy in 1611, portraying him as a sadistic anti-hero. Henrik Ibsen's very first play, simply titled Catiline, was written after the revolutions of 1848 and cast him as a hero fighting his world's corruption. Antonio Salieri composed an opera on the conspiracy in 1792 - Catilina, to a libretto by Giambattista Casti - which went unperformed until 1994 because of its political implications during the French Revolution. Francis Ford Coppola's 2024 film Megalopolis transplanted the whole story into a fictionalised futuristic America, with Adam Driver playing a character named Cesar Catilina opposite Giancarlo Esposito as Mayor Franklyn Cicero. Across two thousand years of reception, Catiline has served as a mirror for whatever crisis the age needed to reflect.