HearLore
ListenSearchLibrary

Follow the threads

Every story connects to a hundred more

Topics
  • Browse all topics
  • Featured
  • Recently added
Categories
  • Browse all categories
  • For you
Answers
  • All answer pages
Journal
  • All entries
  • RSS feed
Terms of service·Privacy policy

2026 HearLore

Preview of HearLore

Free to follow every thread. No paywall, no dead ends.

ListenSearchLibrary

Bilateria

The first evidence of Bilateria in the fossil record comes from trace fossils in Ediacaran sediments, and the first bona fide bilaterian fossil is Kimberella, dating to the 550 million year mark. This ancient creature represents a pivotal moment in evolutionary history, marking the transition from simple radial symmetry to a complex body plan that would eventually dominate the animal kingdom. Nearly all bilaterians maintain a bilaterally symmetrical body as adults, with a distinct front end, or head, and a rear end, or tail, alongside a left-right symmetrical belly and back. This arrangement allows for directional movement, where the front end encounters stimuli such as food, favoring the development of cephalization. Cephalization is a characteristic feature among most bilaterians, where sense organs and central nerve ganglia become concentrated at the front end of the animal. The hypothetical most recent common ancestor of all Bilateria is termed the urbilaterian, and the nature of this first bilaterian remains a matter of intense debate among scientists. One side suggests that acoelomates gave rise to the other groups, meaning the urbilaterian had a solid body, and all body cavities therefore secondarily arose later in different groups. The other side poses that the urbilaterian had a coelom, meaning that the main acoelomate phyla have secondarily lost their body cavities. This debate centers on whether the original bilaterian was a marine worm somewhat like Xenoturbella or if it resembled the planula larvae of some cnidarians. Fossil embryos are known from around the time of Vernanimalcula, but none of these have bilaterian affinities, leaving the exact identity of the urbilaterian shrouded in mystery.

The Great Divergence

Bilaterians constitute one of the five main lineages of animals, the other four being Porifera, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Placozoa. They rapidly diversified in the late Ediacaran and the Cambrian, and are now by far the most successful animal lineage, with over 98% of known animal species. This success is largely due to the triploblastic nature of bilaterian embryos, which have three germ layers: endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm. With few exceptions, bilaterian embryos are triploblastic, having three germ layers, and have complete digestive tracts with a separate mouth and anus. Some bilaterians lack body cavities, while others have a primary body cavity derived from the blastocoel, or a secondary cavity, the coelom. The traditional division of Bilateria into Deuterostomia and Protostomia was based on whether the blastopore becomes the anus or mouth. In protostomes, the first opening of the embryo becomes the mouth, while in deuterostomes, it becomes the anus. The deuterostomes traditionally include the echinoderms, hemichordates, chordates, and the extinct Vetulicolia. The protostomes include most of the rest, such as arthropods, annelids, molluscs, and flatworms. Many taxonomists now recognize at least two more superphyla among the protostomes, Ecdysozoa and Spiralia. The arrow worms have proven difficult to classify, with studies published in 2004 and 2017 placing them in the Gnathifera. This complex web of relationships highlights the dynamic nature of bilaterian evolution, where new evidence constantly reshapes our understanding of the tree of life.

Continue Browsing

BilateriansEdiacaran first appearancesSubkingdomsTaxa named by Berthold Hatschek

Common questions

When did the first bilaterian fossil appear in the fossil record?

The first bona fide bilaterian fossil is Kimberella, dating to the 550 million year mark. This ancient creature represents a pivotal moment in evolutionary history, marking the transition from simple radial symmetry to a complex body plan that would eventually dominate the animal kingdom.

Who named the group Bilateria and when was it named?

The Bilateria were named by the Austrian embryologist Berthold Hatschek in 1888. In his classification, the group included the Zygoneura, Ambulacraria, and Chordonii, the Chordata.

What are the three germ layers found in bilaterian embryos?

Bilaterian embryos are triploblastic, having three germ layers: endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm. With few exceptions, bilaterian embryos are triploblastic, having three germ layers, and have complete digestive tracts with a separate mouth and anus.

How many main lineages of animals exist and what are they?

Bilaterians constitute one of the five main lineages of animals, the other four being Porifera, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Placozoa. They rapidly diversified in the late Ediacaran and the Cambrian, and are now by far the most successful animal lineage, with over 98% of known animal species.

What is the difference between protostomes and deuterostomes regarding the blastopore?

In protostomes, the first opening of the embryo becomes the mouth, while in deuterostomes, it becomes the anus. The deuterostomes traditionally include the echinoderms, hemichordates, chordates, and the extinct Vetulicolia.

When was the phylum Xenacoelomorpha established and what does it include?

The phylum Xenacoelomorpha, once thought to be flatworms, was erected in 2011, and has provided an extra challenge to bilaterian taxonomy, as they likely do not belong to either group. The acoelomorph taxa had previously been considered flatworms with secondarily lost characteristics, but the new relationship suggested that the simple acoelomate worm form was the original bilaterian body plan.

See all questions about Bilateria →

In this section

Loading sources

All sources

 

The Acoelomorph Challenge

The phylum Xenacoelomorpha, once thought to be flatworms, was erected in 2011, and has provided an extra challenge to bilaterian taxonomy, as they likely do not belong to either group. The traditional division of Bilateria into Deuterostomia and Protostomia was challenged when new morphological and molecular evidence supported a sister relationship between the acoelomate taxa, Acoela and Nemertodermatida, together called Acoelomorpha. The latter clade was called Nephrozoa by Jondelius et al. in 2002 and Eubilateria by Baguña and Riutort in 2004. The acoelomorph taxa had previously been considered flatworms with secondarily lost characteristics, but the new relationship suggested that the simple acoelomate worm form was the original bilaterian body plan. This implies that the coelom, the digestive tract, excretory organs, and nerve cords developed in the Nephrozoa. Subsequently, the acoelomorphs were placed in phylum Xenacoelomorpha, together with the xenoturbellids, and the sister relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Nephrozoa supported in phylogenomic analyses. A different hypothesis is that Ambulacraria is sister to Xenacoelomorpha, together forming Xenambulacraria. Xenambulacraria may be sister to Chordata or to Centroneuralia. A 2019 study by Hervé Philippe and colleagues presents the tree, cautioning that the support values are very low, meaning there is no solid evidence to refute the traditional protostome and deuterostome dichotomy. As of 2024, the issue of which hypothesis is correct remains unresolved, leaving the scientific community to grapple with the implications of these new findings.

The Embryonic Blueprint

Animals with a bilaterally symmetric body plan that mainly move in one direction have a head end and a tail end as well as a back and a belly, therefore they also have a left side and a right side. Having a front end means that this part of the body encounters stimuli, such as food, favoring cephalization, the development of a head with sense organs and a mouth. Most bilaterians have a gut that extends through the body from mouth to anus, sometimes called a through gut, and sometimes a wormlike body plan with a hydrostatic skeleton. Xenacoelomorphs, on the other hand, have a bag gut with one opening. Many bilaterian phyla have primary larvae which swim with cilia and have an apical organ containing sensory cells. Some bilaterians have only weakly condensed nerve nets, similar to those in cnidarians, while others have either a ventral nerve cord, a dorsal nerve cord, or both. Bilaterians, presumably including the urbilaterian, share many more Hox genes controlling the development of their more complex bodies, including of their heads, than do the Cnidaria and the Acoelomorpha. These Hox genes are crucial for the development of the body plan, allowing for the complexity seen in modern bilaterians. The presence of these genes suggests that the urbilaterian was already a complex organism, capable of developing a head and a tail, and a distinct front and back. This complexity is what sets bilaterians apart from other animal lineages, allowing them to occupy a wide range of ecological niches and evolve into the diverse array of species we see today.

The Fossil Record Mystery

The Bilateria were named by the Austrian embryologist Berthold Hatschek in 1888. In his classification, the group included the Zygoneura, Ambulacraria, and Chordonii, the Chordata. In 1910, the Austrian zoologist Karl Grobben renamed the Zygoneura to Protostomia, and created the Deuterostomia to encompass the Ambulacraria and Chordonii. This historical context provides a window into the early days of bilaterian classification, when scientists were just beginning to understand the diversity of animal life. The naming of the group reflects the evolving understanding of bilaterian relationships, as new evidence and techniques have led to the reclassification of many species. The traditional division of Bilateria into Deuterostomia and Protostomia was based on whether the blastopore becomes the anus or mouth. This division has been challenged by new evidence, leading to the recognition of additional superphyla and the reclassification of many species. The history of bilaterian classification is a testament to the dynamic nature of scientific inquiry, where new evidence constantly reshapes our understanding of the tree of life. The work of scientists like Berthold Hatschek and Karl Grobben laid the foundation for modern bilaterian taxonomy, and their contributions continue to influence the field today.