Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Arthropod

14 min listen · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Up to ten million species share a single trick: a body wrapped in armor that cannot grow with them. Arthropods, the invertebrates of the phylum Arthropoda, build an exoskeleton from chitin, sometimes hardened with calcium carbonate. Their bodies come in repeated segments, and their limbs are jointed. That last feature names them. The Greek words for jointed leg gave us arthropod. These animals account for over 80 percent of all known living animal species. They live in the sea, in fresh water, on land, and in the air. They are one of only two major animal groups that have truly mastered dry environments. The other is the amniotes, which means reptiles, birds, and mammals. To grow at all, an arthropod must abandon its old shell and risk death in the open. So how does a creature locked inside rigid plates manage to change its shape, feed a continent, and spread disease across it? How did so many forms, from a crab to a mosquito to a barnacle, descend from one common ancestor? And why has working out their family tree taken scientists a century of argument? The answers begin with a problem so stubborn it earned its own name.

  • R. E. Snodgrass, in 1960, hoped a certain puzzle would never be solved, because he found trying to solve it too much fun. The puzzle was how arthropod heads came to be. The four major groups each fuse a different combination of segments into a head. Chelicerata covers sea spiders, horseshoe crabs, and arachnids. Myriapoda covers symphylans, pauropods, millipedes, and centipedes. Pancrustacea covers copepods, malacostracans, branchiopods, hexapods, and more. The extinct Trilobita made up the fourth. Their appendages are missing or specialized in different ways, and reconstructing the steps between them is so hard it became known as The arthropod head problem.

    The embryos of all arthropods are segmented, built from a series of repeated modules. The last common ancestor probably had a row of undifferentiated segments, each with a pair of limbs. Every living and fossil arthropod has since grouped these segments into tagmata, where segments and their limbs are specialized. This grouping is why many insects look three-part and spiders look two-part. In mites, there are no external signs of segmentation at all.

    Myriapods and hexapods happen to share similar head combinations, yet hexapods sit deeply nested within crustacea while myriapods do not. So those traits are believed to have evolved separately. Some extinct arthropods, such as Marrella, belong to none of the four groups. Their heads are built from their own particular combinations of segments and specialized appendages, a reminder that the body plan was once far more varied than the survivors suggest.

  • One writer described arthropods as like Swiss Army knives, each equipped with a unique set of specialized tools. Originally each appendage-bearing segment seems to have carried two separate pairs of appendages: an upper, unsegmented exite and a lower, segmented endopod. These later fused into biramous appendages joined by a basal segment, the upper branch acting as a gill and the lower as a leg. In segment after segment, those limbs were modified into gills, mouth-parts, antennae for collecting information, or claws for grasping. In many lineages, appendages simply vanished, especially from the abdomen.

    Setae, the bristles that grow from special cells in the epidermis, are as varied as the limbs. Some detect air or water currents or contact with objects. Aquatic arthropods use feather-like setae to enlarge swimming appendages and to filter food from water. Air-breathing aquatic insects trap a film of air in thick felt-like coats of setae, extending the time they can stay submerged. Heavy, rigid setae become defensive spines.

    Muscles attached to the inside of the exoskeleton flex every arthropod's limbs. Some animals still extend their limbs with hydraulic pressure, a system inherited from pre-arthropod ancestors. All spiders extend their legs this way and can generate pressures up to eight times their resting level.

  • Moulting may be responsible for 80 to 90 percent of all arthropod deaths. The exoskeleton cannot stretch, so it caps growth, and the only escape is ecdysis: shedding the old shell, the exuviae, once a new one has grown beneath it. These cycles run nearly continuously until the animal reaches full size. The stages between each moult until sexual maturity are called instars, and one instar differs from the next in body proportions, colors, patterns, or even the number of body segments.

    The animal first stops feeding while its epidermis releases moulting fluid, a mix of enzymes that digests the endocuticle and loosens the old cuticle. A new epicuticle protects the epidermis from those enzymes. Then the body swells by taking in a large quantity of water or air, splitting the old cuticle along predefined weak lines where the exocuticle was thinnest. It commonly takes several minutes to struggle free.

    At that moment the new cuticle is wrinkled and so soft the animal can barely move or support itself. It keeps pumping itself up to stretch the new cuticle as far as possible, then hardens the new exocuticle and expels the excess air or water. Many arthropods then eat the discarded cuticle to reclaim its materials. A fossil of Marrella from the Burgess Shale gave the earliest clear evidence that this dangerous ritual is ancient.

  • Haemolymph, the arthropod equivalent of blood, flows not through closed vessels but through a body cavity called a haemocoel. The circulatory system is open. The heart is a muscular tube running just under the back for most of the body's length. It contracts in ripples from rear to front, pushing blood forward. Paired ostia, non-return valves along the heart, let blood in but stop it leaving before it reaches the front.

    Oxygen delivery varies widely. Small species often have no respiratory system at all, relying on simple diffusion through the body surface. Crustaceans usually breathe through gills that are modified appendages. Many arachnids have book lungs. Tracheae, branching tunnels running from openings in the body wall, carry oxygen directly to individual cells in many insects, myriapods, and arachnids. The most common respiratory pigment is copper-based hemocyanin, used by many crustaceans and a few centipedes, while a few crustaceans and insects use iron-based hemoglobin.

    Excretion splits along the same aquatic-terrestrial divide. Aquatic arthropods produce ammonia, so toxic it must be diluted with water and flushed out, mainly through the gills. All crustaceans use this, and its heavy water cost may explain their failure as land animals. Terrestrial groups instead make uric acid, excreted as dry material through the Malpighian tubule system. The nervous system keeps the segmented theme: paired nerve cords run below the gut and form a pair of ganglia in each segment, giving a characteristic ladder-like appearance.

  • The ommatidia of bees carry receptors for both green and ultra-violet light. Compound eyes are built from fifteen to several thousand of these independent columns, usually hexagonal in cross section, each with its own light-sensitive cells and often its own lens and cornea. Such eyes have a wide field of view and can catch fast movement, and in some cases the polarization of light. The trade-off is coarse images. Compound eyes are shorter-sighted than those of birds and mammals, though that hardly matters since objects within 20 cm matter most to the animal.

    Pigment-cup ocelli, the little eyes, usually only report the direction light comes from, using the shadow cast by the cup walls. Spiders break this rule. Their main eyes are pigment-cup ocelli capable of forming images, and the main eyes of jumping spiders can rotate to track prey.

    The stiff cuticle would block out the world, except that sensors pierce it everywhere. Touch sensors, mostly setae, respond to everything from strong contact to faint air currents, while chemical sensors give the animal taste and smell. Most arthropods lack balance and acceleration sensors and rely on their eyes to tell up from down. A cockroach rights itself when pressure sensors on the underside of its feet report no pressure. Many malacostracan crustaceans, by contrast, carry statocysts that work like the balance organs of the vertebrate inner ear.

  • Aphids are genuinely viviparous, a rarity in a phylum where almost everything lays eggs. Reproduction otherwise runs the full range. A few arthropods, such as barnacles, are hermaphroditic, carrying organs of both sexes. A few insects and crustaceans reproduce by parthenogenesis, especially when conditions favor a population explosion, but most rely on sexual reproduction and revert to it when times grow harder.

    All terrestrial arthropods use internal fertilization, sometimes by indirect transfer rather than direct injection. Harvestmen, millipedes, and some crustaceans use modified appendages such as gonopods to transfer sperm directly. Most male terrestrial arthropods instead make spermatophores, waterproof packets of sperm that females take into their bodies, usually only after complex courtship rituals look likely to succeed. Aquatic species breed by external fertilization, as horseshoe crabs do, or by internal fertilization.

    Hatchlings vary as much as the adults. Scorpions are ovoviviparous, producing live young after eggs hatch inside the mother, and they are noted for prolonged maternal care. Silverfish hatch as miniature adults that do not feed and may be helpless until their first moult. Many insects hatch as grubs or caterpillars without segmented limbs, then dissolve their larval tissues and rebuild themselves into adults. Crustaceans commonly hatch as tiny nauplius larvae with only three segments. Maternal care across the phylum ranges from nonexistent to the prolonged tending of social insects.

  • From 1952 to 1977, zoologist Sidnie Manton and others argued that arthropods are polyphyletic, sharing no common ancestor that was itself an arthropod. They proposed three separate origins from worm-like ancestors: the chelicerates, the crustaceans, and the uniramia of onychophorans, myriapods, and hexapods. Their evidence was the differences. The groups hardened their cuticles by different chemical means, built their compound eyes differently, and divided into limbs that were biramous in crustaceans but uniramous in the others.

    Discoveries in the 1990s reversed that view. Graham Budd's analyses of Kerygmachela in 1993 and Opabinia in 1996 convinced him these animals resembled onychophorans and Early Cambrian lobopods, and he drew a family tree placing them as aunts and cousins of all arthropods. Claus Nielsen proposed Panarthropoda for the wider group and Euarthropoda for the true arthropods with jointed limbs and hardened cuticles. Molecular work on DNA sequences then placed arthropods inside a superphylum called Ecdysozoa, the animals that moult, alongside nematodes, priapulids, and tardigrades, but excluding the annelids once thought to be their closest kin.

    The deep past offers anchors. The earliest Cambrian trilobite fossils are about 520 million years old, yet already diverse and worldwide. Eurypterids, scorpion-like and aquatic, became the largest arthropods ever, some as long as 2.5 m. The oldest known arachnid is the trigonotarbid Palaeotarbus jerami from the Silurian. Today the living phylum is split into four subphyla, one of them, the artiopods including trilobites, gone extinct in the Permian-Triassic event. The arguments over the rest, over where Myriapoda, Chelicerata, and Pancrustacea truly sit, are still unsettled, and the cladogram after Liu et al, 2026 still leaves whole assemblages marked with daggers and question marks.

    A 2008 study put a price on a single arthropod service. Examining the 100 crops the FAO lists as grown for food, it estimated pollination's economic value at 153 billion euros, or 9.5 percent of the value of world agricultural production used for human food in 2005. Bees do more than pollinate. They produce honey, the basis of a fast-growing industry and international trade. The greatest contribution of arthropods to the human food supply is this quiet work in the fields.

    Arthropods also enter the diet directly. Crabs, lobsters, crayfish, shrimp, and prawns have long been eaten and are now farmed commercially. Insects and their grubs are at least as nutritious as meat. Cooked tarantulas are a delicacy in Cambodia and among the Piaroa Indians of southern Venezuela, once the irritant hairs are removed. The red dye cochineal, drawn from a Central American insect, was prized by the Aztecs and Mayans and became Mexico's second most-lucrative export under Spanish control. The blood of horseshoe crabs yields limulus amebocyte lysate, used to test that antibiotics and kidney machines are free of dangerous bacteria.

    The same phylum carries terrible cargo. Malaria, spread by Anopheles mosquitoes, causes 267 million cases a year and one to two million deaths. Dengue fever and yellow fever ride the Aedes mosquito, filariasis the Culex. The mite Varroa destructor has become the single largest problem faced by beekeepers worldwide, and the heavy pesticide campaigns against arthropod pests have left long-term marks on human health and biodiversity. The animals that feed the world's crops are the same ones whose body plan now serves as a model for robotics, where redundant segments let a machine keep moving even with a damaged or lost appendage.

Up Next

Common questions

What is an arthropod and what defines the phylum Arthropoda?

An arthropod is an invertebrate in the phylum Arthropoda, defined by an exoskeleton with a cuticle made of chitin, a body of differentiated segments, and paired jointed appendages. The word arthropod comes from Greek words meaning jointed leg. Arthropods account for over 80 percent of all known living animal species.

How many arthropod species are there?

Estimates of arthropod species range from about 1,170,000 to 5 to 10 million. Arthropoda is the largest animal phylum, and its sub-group the insects includes more described species than any other taxonomic class. A 1992 study estimated 365,000 of the 500,000 animal and plant species in Costa Rica were arthropods.

Why do arthropods moult their exoskeletons?

Arthropods moult because their exoskeleton cannot stretch and therefore restricts growth. Through ecdysis they shed the old cuticle, the exuviae, after growing a new one beneath it. Moulting is dangerous and may be responsible for 80 to 90 percent of all arthropod deaths.

What are the four main groups of arthropods?

The four major groups of arthropods are Chelicerata, which includes sea spiders, horseshoe crabs, and arachnids; Myriapoda, which includes millipedes and centipedes; Pancrustacea, which includes copepods, malacostracans, branchiopods, and hexapods; and the extinct Trilobita. The living phylum is typically divided into four subphyla, one of them extinct.

How do arthropods benefit humans?

The greatest contribution of arthropods to humans is pollination, valued by a 2008 study at 153 billion euros, or 9.5 percent of world agricultural production used for human food in 2005. Crustaceans, insects, and their grubs are eaten as food, bees produce honey, and horseshoe crab blood yields limulus amebocyte lysate used to test antibiotics and kidney machines for bacteria.

What diseases do arthropods spread to humans?

Blood-sucking insects spread severe diseases including malaria, carried by Anopheles mosquitoes, which causes 267 million cases and one to two million deaths a year. Aedes mosquitoes spread dengue fever and yellow fever, and Culex mosquitoes spread filariasis. Ticks can cause tick paralysis and parasite-borne diseases.

When did arthropods first appear in the fossil record?

The evolutionary ancestry of arthropods dates back to the Cambrian period, and the earliest Cambrian trilobite fossils are about 520 million years old. Arthropods also provide the earliest identifiable fossils of land animals, from the Late Silurian, and the scorpion-like eurypterids grew as long as 2.5 m.

All sources

175 references cited across the entry

  1. 1JournalThe correct authorship of Arthropoda—A reappraisalCarlos A. Martínez-Muñoz — 2023-05-04
  2. 2BookVergleichende ZoologieJ. L. C. Gravenhorst — Druck und Verlag von Graß, Barth und Comp — 1843
  3. 3ArthropodaOnline Etymology Dictionary
  4. 4BookVergleichende ZoologieJ. L. C. Gravenhorst — Graß, Barth & Comp. — 1843
  5. 8On the Origin of PhylaJ. W. Valentine — University of Chicago Press — 2004
  6. 9Arthropod cuticle features and arthropod monophylyB. Cutler — August 1980
  7. 11JournalNatural calcification of the prosomatic endosternite in the Phalangiidae (Arachnida: Opiliones).J. Kovoor — 1978
  8. 13The Arthropod StoryAnna Thanukos — University of California, Berkeley
  9. 15The Coevolutionary ProcessJ. N. Thompson — University of Chicago Press — 1994
  10. 16JournalTantulocarida (Crustacea) of the Southern Ocean deep sea, and the description of three new species of TantulacusInga Mohrbeck et al. — October 2010
  11. 17Scaling: Why is animal size so important?Knut Schmidt-Nielsen — Cambridge University Press — 1984
  12. 18JournalExites in Cambrian arthropods and homology of arthropod limb branchesYu Liu et al. — 2021-07-30
  13. 19JournalOrigin and evolution of the panarthropod head – A palaeobiological and developmental perspectiveJavier Ortega-Hernández et al. — 2017
  14. 21JournalClonal analysis of Distal-less and engrailed expression patterns during early morphogenesis of uniramous and biramous crustacean limbsAndreas Hejnol et al. — 2004-10-01
  15. 22JournalThe clonal composition of biramous and uniramous arthropod limbsCarsten Wolff et al. — 2008-05-07
  16. 23Shaking the Tree: Readings from Nature in the History of LifeShubin, Neil et al. — University of Chicago Press — 2000
  17. 24JournalSegmentation and tagmosis in ChelicerataJason A. Dunlop et al. — 2017
  18. 25Redescription of Marrella splendens (Trilobitoidea) from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British ColumbiaH. B. Whittington — 1971
  19. 26JournalA palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problemG. E. Budd — 16 May 2002
  20. 27Facts and theories concerning the insect headR. E. Snodgrass — 1960
  21. 28BookMechanical Design in OrganismsS. A. Wainwright — Princeton University Press — 1982
  22. 29On biomineralizationH. A. Lowenstam et al. — Oxford University Press — 1989
  23. 33The Invertebrates: A SynthesisBarnes, R. S. K. et al. — Blackwell Publishing — 2001
  24. 34The hydraulic mechanism of the spider legParry, D. A. et al. — 1959
  25. 35JournalMiniaturized imaging systemsR. Völkel — June 2003
  26. 36Encyclopedia of Life SciencesOlive, P. J. W. — John Wiley & Sons — 2001
  27. 37JournalInventory and phylogenomic distribution of meiotic genes in Nasonia vitripennis and among diverse arthropodsA. M. Schurko et al. — February 2010
  28. 38BookMolecular Genetics of DevelopmentH. Bernstein et al. — 1987
  29. 40European Arachnology 2000Wilson R. Lourenço — Aarhus University Press — 2002
  30. 41JournalThe origins of insect metamorphosisJ. W. Truman et al. — September 1999
  31. 42Diversity and Adaptations of the Aquatic InsectsG. Smith — New College of Florida
  32. 43Crustacea and Arthropod RelationshipsJan Bergström et al. — Taylor & Francis — 2005
  33. 44Arthropod ancestor had the mouth of a penis wormConor McKeever — 30 September 2016
  34. 46JournalA Parvancorina-like arthropod from the Cambrian of South ChinaJ. P. Lin et al. — 2006
  35. 47Spriggina is a trilobitoid ecdysozoanMcMenamin, M.A.S — 2003
  36. 48JournalEarly fossil record of Euarthropoda and the Cambrian ExplosionAllison C. Daley et al. — 2018-05-22
  37. 49JournalFirst Early Cambrian RadiolariaA. Braun — 2007
  38. 56JournalThe evolution of biramous appendages revealed by a carapace-bearing Cambrian arthropodD. Fu et al. — 2022
  39. 57The Burgess ShaleWhittington, H.B. — Yale University Press — 1985
  40. 58JournalMoulting arthropod caught in the actD. C. García-Bellido et al. — May 2004
  41. 59JournalThe Fossil Record of the PancrustaceaThomas A. Hegna et al. — Oxford University Press — 2020-09-10
  42. 60JournalCollective Behavior in an Early Cambrian ArthropodXian-Guang Hou et al. — 2008-10-10
  43. 61Crustaceans and the "Cambrian Explosion"G. E. Budd — December 2001
  44. 62JournalA New Arthropod in Chainlike Associations from the Cnengjiang Lagerstätte (Lower Cambrian), Yunnan, ChinaHou Xian-Guang et al. — 2009
  45. 63JournalAn epipodite-bearing crown-group crustacean from the Lower CambrianX.-G. Zhang — October 2007
  46. 64JournalEarly Terrestrial Animals, Evolution, and UncertaintyRussell J. Garwood et al. — 2011
  47. 65JournalThe colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropodsPisani, D. — 2004
  48. 66BookHistory of LifeCowen, R. — Blackwell Science — 2000
  49. 67JournalGiant claw reveals the largest ever arthropodS. J. Braddy — 2008
  50. 69JournalA replacement name for the trigonotarbid arachnid Eotarbus DunlopDunlop, J. A. — 1999
  51. 70JournalFossil evidence for the origin of spider spinneretsP. A. Selden — December 2008
  52. 71JournalFossil mesothele spidersP. A. Selden — February 1996
  53. 73JournalStranger than a scorpion: a reassessment of Parioscorpio venator, a problematic arthropod from the Llandoverian Waukesha LagerstätteEvan P. Anderson et al. — 2021
  54. 74JournalBook-lungs in a Lower Carboniferous scorpionA. J. Jeram — January 1990
  55. 75JournalExploring the evolution and terrestrialization of scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones) with rocks and clocksRichard J. Howard et al. — 2019-03-01
  56. 76JournalThe Lower Devonian scorpion Waeringoscorpio and the respiratory nature of its filamentous structures, with the description of a new species from the Westerwald area, GermanyMarkus Poschmann et al. — December 2008
  57. 77JournalNew light shed on the oldest insectM. S. Engel et al. — February 2004
  58. 78JournalThe presumed oldest flying insect: more likely a myriapod?Carolin Haug et al. — 2017-05-30
  59. 79BookGondwana Alive: Biodiversity and the Evolving BiosphereC. Labandeira et al. — Witwatersrand University Press — 2000
  60. 80BookEntomologyC. Gillott — Springer — 1995
  61. 81Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny, edited by Gregory D. EdgecombAdrain, J. — Palaeontologia Electronica — 15 March 1999
  62. 82JournalHead segmentation in Early Cambrian Fuxianhuia: implications for arthropod evolutionChen, J.-Y. — 2 June 1995
  63. 83JournalThe morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem-groupBudd, G.E. — 1996
  64. 84JournalA Cambrian gilled lobopod from GreenlandBudd, G. E. — 1993
  65. 85BookAnimal Evolution: Interrelationships of the living phylaNielsen, C. — Oxford University Press — 2001
  66. 86JournalDistinguishing anomalocaridids from arthropods and priapulidsX.-G. Hou — 2006
  67. 87Press releaseMisunderstood worm-like fossil finds its place in the Tree of LifeCambridge University — 17 August 2014
  68. 88JournalCambrian origins and affinities of an enigmatic fossil group of arthropodsVaccari, N.E. et al. — 29 July 2004
  69. 89JournalThe position of the Arthropoda in the phylogenetic systemA. Schmidt-Rhaesa — January 1999
  70. 90JournalThe evolution of the EcdysozoaM.J. Telford — January 2008
  71. 91JournalArthropod Origins: Integrating Paleontological and Molecular EvidenceGregory D. Edgecombe — 2020
  72. 92JournalMaking sense of 'lower' and 'upper' stem-group Euarthropoda, with comments on the strict use of the name Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848Javier Ortega-Hernández — 2016
  73. 93JournalThe origin and early evolution of arthropodsCédric Aria — 2022-04-26
  74. 94JournalChallenging received wisdoms: Some contributions of the new microscopy to the new animal phylogenyR. A. Jenner — April 2006
  75. 95JournalFossil Focus: ChelicerataJason A. Dunlop — 31 January 2011
  76. 96Journal3D morphology of the Cambrian bivalved arthropod Sunella informs about head segmentation, arthrodization, and arthropodizationCong Liu et al. — 2026-03-21
  77. 98JournalOrdovician opabiniid-like animals and the role of the proboscis in euarthropod head evolutionS. Pates et al. — 2022
  78. 99JournalA Cambrian fossil from the Chengjiang fauna sharing characteristics with gilled lobopodians, opabiniids and radiodontsJianni Liu et al. — 2022-07-22
  79. 100JournalA possibly deep branching artiopodan arthropod from the lower Cambrian Sirius Passet Lagerstätte (North Greenland)H. O. Berks et al. — 2023
  80. 101JournalBurgess Shale fossils shed light on the agnostid problemMoysiuk J, Caron JB — January 2019
  81. 104JournalThree-dimensional morphology of the biramous appendages in Isoxys from the early Cambrian of South China, and its implications for early euarthropod evolutionCaixia Zhang et al. — 19 April 2023
  82. 105JournalA new marrellomorph arthropod from southern Ontario: a rare case of soft-tissue preservation on a Late Ordovician open marine shelfJoseph Moysiuk et al. — July 2022
  83. 106JournalVariation in appendages in early Cambrian bradoriids reveals a wide range of body plans in stem-euarthropodsDayou Zhai et al. — 2019-09-03
  84. 107JournalA Reduced Labrum in a Cambrian Great-Appendage EuarthropodYu Liu et al. — August 2020
  85. 108JournalRevised systematics of Palaeozoic 'horseshoe crabs' and the myth of monophyletic XiphosuraJames C. Lamsdell — 2012-12-18
  86. 109JournalArthropod fossil data increase congruence of morphological and molecular phylogeniesDavid A. Legg et al. — 2013-09-30
  87. 110JournalFuxianhuiids are mandibulates and share affinities with total-group MyriapodaC. Aria et al. — 2021
  88. 111JournalThe Cambrian Odaraia alata and the colonization of nektonic suspension-feeding niches by early mandibulatesAlejandro Izquierdo-López et al. — August 2024
  89. 112JournalAquatic stem group myriapods close a gap between molecular divergence dates and terrestrial fossil recordGregory D. Edgecombe et al. — 2020
  90. 113JournalDescription of Acheronauta gen. nov., a possible mandibulate from the Silurian Waukesha Lagerstätte, Wisconsin, USAM. A. Pulsipher et al. — 2022
  91. 117JournalNew Euthycarcinoids and an Enigmatic Arthropod from the British Coal MeasuresHeather M. Wilson et al. — February 2001
  92. 118JournalFunction and hydrostatics in the telson of the Burgess Shale arthropod BurgessiaJih-Pai Lin — 2009-06-23
  93. 120JournalEarliest-known uniramous arthropodRichard A. Robison — January 1990
  94. 121The enigmatic arthropod CamptophylliaR. Garwood et al. — 18 February 2012
  95. 123JournalA new euarthropod from the Soom Shale (Ordovician) Konservat-Lagerstätte, South Africa, with exceptional preservation of the connective endoskeleton and myoanatomySarah E. Gabbott et al. — 2025
  96. 124JournalNew multipodomerous appendages of stem-group euarthropods from the Cambrian (Stage 4) Guanshan Konservat-LagerstätteDe-guang Jiao et al. — November 2021
  97. 125JournalNotchia weugi gen. et sp. nov.: a new short-headed arthropod from the Weeks Formation Konservat-Lagerstätte (Cambrian; Utah)Rudy Lerosey-Aubril — March 2015
  98. 126JournalThe 'butterfly animal,' Papiliomaris kluessendorfae n. gen. n. sp.: An enigmatic bivalved arthropod of the Waukesha biotaEvan P. Anderson et al. — 16 September 2025
  99. 127JournalRedescription of the cheloniellid euarthropod Triopus draboviensis from the Upper Ordovician of Bohemia, with comments on the affinities of Parioscorpio venatorPeter Van Roy et al. — 2022-06-13
  100. 128JournalA Possible Tracemaker for Arthrophycus AlleghaniensisVictoria E. McCoy et al. — November 2012
  101. 129JournalAn Early Devonian arthropod fauna from the Windyfield cherts, Aberdeenshire, ScotlandLyall I. Anderson et al. — May 2003
  102. 130JournalSarotrocercus oblitus - Small arthropod with great impact on the understanding of arthropod evolution?J.T. Haug et al. — 2011-11-01
  103. 131JournalThe phylogeny of aglaspidid arthropods and the internal relationships within ArtiopodaJavier Ortega-Hernández et al. — 2013
  104. 133JournalDevonohexapodus bocksbergensis is a synonym of Wingertshellicus backesi (Euarthropoda) – no evidence for marine hexapods living in the Devonian Hunsrück SeaGabrielle Kühl et al. — 2009
  105. 134JournalThe diverse radiodont fauna from the Marjum Formation of Utah, USA (Cambrian: Drumian)Stephen Pates et al. — 19 January 2021
  106. 135JournalA possible vicissicaudatan arthropod from the Late Carboniferous Mazon Creek LagerstätteVictoria E. McCoy et al. — 2025
  107. 136JournalPhylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and CrustaceaAntonio Carapelli et al. — 16 August 2007
  108. 137JournalPancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: support for Remipedia as the possible sister group of HexapodaBjoern M. von Reumont et al. — 2011
  109. 140JournalArthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequencesJerome C. Regier et al. — 2010
  110. 141JournalA Phylogenomic Solution to the Origin of Insects by Resolving Crustacean-Hexapod RelationshipsMartin Schwentner et al. — 19 June 2017
  111. 142JournalPancrustacean Evolution Illuminated by Taxon-Rich GenomicScale Data Sets with an Expanded Remipede SamplingJesus Lozano-Fernandez et al. — 2019
  112. 143JournalThe Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of ArthropodsGonzalo Giribet et al. — June 2019
  113. 144JournalPhylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolutionBernhard Misof — 2014
  114. 145BookCrustacean Farming: Ranching and CultureWickins, J. F. et al. — Blackwell — 2002
  115. 146Bugfood II: Insects as Food!?!Bailey, S. — University of Kentucky Department of Entomology
  116. 147Bugfood III: Insect Snacks from Around the WorldUnger, L. — University of Kentucky Department of Entomology
  117. 148Tuck into a TarantulaR. Rigby — September 21, 2002
  118. 150BookLonely Planet CambodiaN. Ray — Lonely Planet Publications — 2002
  119. 151Fierce FoodC. Weil — Plume — 2006
  120. 152Butterflies in My Stomach (or: Insects in Human Nutrition)R. L. Taylor — Woodbridge Press Publishing Company, Santa Barbara, California — 1975
  121. 153Codex Standard 152 of 1985 (on "Wheat Flour")Codex commission for food hygiene — Food and Agriculture Organization — 1985
  122. 154Complete list of Official StandardsFood and Agriculture Organization
  123. 155The Food Defect Action LevelsU. S. Food and Drug Administration
  124. 159Time line of fabricsThreads In Tyme, LTD
  125. 163JournalInsects and their chemical weaponry: New potential for drug discoveryAaron Dossey — December 2010
  126. 165Adaptive Motion of Animals and MachinesKazuo Tsuchiya et al. — 2006
  127. 166The Economic Importance of InsectsHill, D. — Springer — 1997
  128. 167Tick-borne diseases of humansJesse L. Goodman et al. — ASM Press — 2005
  129. 168Parasitic Mites of HumansPotter, M. F. — University of Kentucky College of Agriculture
  130. 169House dust mite allergyKlenerman, Paul et al.
  131. 170Ecological EntomologyM. Kogan et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 1999
  132. 171Insect and Mite Pests in Food: An Illustrated KeyJ. Richard Gorham — United States Department of Agriculture — 1991
  133. 172JournalMite Pests of Honey BeesJong, D. D. et al. — January 1982
  134. 173Introduction to insect pest managementRobert Lee Metcalf et al. — Wiley-IEEE — 1994
  135. 174Encyclopedia of Life SciencesShultz, J. W. — John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. — 2001
  136. 175Which predatory mite can control both a dominant mite pest, Tetranychus urticae, and a latent mite pest, Eotetranychus asiaticus, on strawberry?Osakabe, M. — March 2002