Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Antenna (radio)

11 min listen · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • In 1886, a German physicist named Heinrich Hertz built the first antennas, placing dipole elements at the focal point of parabolic reflectors. He was trying to prove that something invisible was real. James Clerk Maxwell had predicted electromagnetic waves in his 1867 theory, but no one had yet caught them in the act. Hertz used his crude structures to transmit and receive those waves, and the proof held. An antenna, in the language of radio-frequency engineering, is the structure that converts alternating electric currents into radio waves, and then converts those waves back into currents. It is the interface between two worlds: energy moving as waves through space, and energy moving as electrons in metal. Every radio receiver and transmitter needs one. But how does a piece of metal persuade an electric current to leap off into empty space? Why must some antennas be aimed with care while others can sit on a table pointing nowhere in particular? And why does the ground beneath an antenna matter as much as the antenna itself? The answers run from a tent pole in Italy to the physics of standing waves trapped inside a wire.

  • In the summer of 1895, Guglielmo Marconi began testing his wireless system outdoors on his father's estate near Bologna. He soon started experimenting with long wire aerials suspended from a pole. In Italian, a tent pole is called l'antenna centrale, and the pole carrying the wire was simply called l'antenna. The name stuck to the device rather than the support. Until that moment, the radiating and receiving elements of wireless apparatus had no special name. Engineers called them terminals. Because of Marconi's prominence, his casual word spread first among wireless researchers and enthusiasts, then to the general public. The word travels with a regional split. American English keeps antenna, while British English often says aerial, and the two are used interchangeably. Occasionally aerial means something narrower: an elevated horizontal wire. The same year his vocabulary took hold, Marconi began developing antennas practical for long-distance wireless telegraphy. By 1898 he had opened a factory in Chelmsford, England, to manufacture his invention.

  • The majority of antenna designs rest on a single idea: resonance. Inside a metal element, moving electrons reflect off the surfaces where the dielectric constant changes, much as light reflects when optical properties shift. The end of a conductor is one such surface. When a radio signal's electric field induces a voltage in the wire, a current starts flowing, and when that current reaches the open end, it reflects, which amounts to a 180 degree change in phase. If the conductor is a quarter wavelength long, the current shifts 90 degrees on the way out, flips 180 degrees at the end, then shifts another 90 degrees coming back. The total is a full 360 degrees, returning it in step with the source. The current adds to itself instant by instant, building a standing wave with maximum current at the feed point. This is why a resonant antenna's element is about a quarter of the wavelength, or an odd multiple of that. The same element will also resonate when fed at three times its design frequency, so antennas can be operated harmonically. The half-wave dipole, two such elements arranged end-to-end along one axis, is probably the most widely used antenna design of all. Its physical arrangement places the two halves 180 degrees out of phase, so one element drives current into the line while the other pulls it out.

  • Consider a half-wave dipole built for signals with a wavelength of one meter, roughly 50 centimeters from tip to tip. If its length-to-diameter ratio is 1000, the element has an inherent impedance of about 63 ohms, purely resistive. Feed it one ampere and it demands 63 volts, radiating 63 watts of radio frequency power once losses are set aside. Now feed the same antenna a signal at 1.25 meters. The induced current arrives at the feed point out of phase, the net current drops while the voltage holds, and electrically the antenna now looks like a very high impedance. The antenna and its transmission line no longer match, so the signal reflects backward into the antenna and the output falls. The mismatch on a feedline is measured by a parameter called the standing wave ratio, or SWR. Because a current reflects wherever the electrical properties change, the junction between feedline and antenna must present the same impedance on both sides, or power bounces back toward the transmitter. The cure is impedance matching, often handled by a circuit called an antenna tuner or transmatch placed between transmitter and antenna. This narrow tolerance is why resonant designs are inherently narrow-band, useful only over a small range of frequencies clustered around resonance. A true antenna tuner does more than cancel reactance; it transforms the leftover resistance to match both the feedline and the radio, using at least two adjustable elements.

  • At 30 megahertz, a true quarter-wave monopole stands almost 2.5 meters tall. Many installations cannot spare that height, so engineers shorten the element to 1.5 meters and add a loading coil. As a monopole or dipole is cut shorter for a given frequency, its impedance becomes dominated by a series capacitive reactance, a negative quantity. A loading coil supplies an equal and opposite inductive reactance, cancelling the capacitance and leaving a pure resistance. The coil is then said to have lengthened the antenna to an electrical length of 2.5 meters, even though it is physically shorter. The trick has a cost. The resistive impedance that remains is much lower than a true quarter-wave monopole would offer, often requiring a further transformer to reach the desired transmission line. As antennas grow shorter still, the radiation resistance plummets roughly as the square of the length, and the system behaves like a resonant circuit with a higher Q factor and a narrower bandwidth. That bandwidth can shrink until it no longer covers the transmitted signal's spectrum. Bandwidth, more than anything else, sets the size of antennas at one megahertz and below. The most familiar shrunken antenna sits inside portable AM receivers: a loopstick, a loop of wire wound around a ferrite rod, resonated by a tuning capacitor that tracks the receiver's dial across the broadcast band.

  • When a radio wave hits a large conducting sheet, it reflects with the phase of its electric field reversed, exactly as a mirror reflects light. Placing such a reflector behind an otherwise non-directional antenna redirects the power that would have escaped backward, raising the gain by a factor of at least two. A corner reflector can squeeze all of an antenna's power into a single quadrant of space or less. The reflector need not be solid metal; a curtain of rods aligned with the antenna's polarization works just as well while cutting weight and wind load. The same optical thinking produces the parabolic reflector, whose curved surface focuses an incoming wave onto a feed antenna at its focal point, yielding an effective area close to the size of the dish itself. Other antennas exploit passive elements rather than mirrors. A Yagi-Uda array places several parallel half-wave elements of very specific lengths along a boom that serves only for support. Just one element connects to the transmitter; the rest are passive radiators that reshape the field, producing large gain in one direction at the expense of a limited bandwidth. The log-periodic dipole array looks similar but operates on an opposite principle. Every element connects electrically to its neighbor with a phase reversal, and the self-similar geometry holds gain and impedance steady across a very wide bandwidth, which is why these serve as rooftop television antennas.

  • Antenna gain measures how sharply an antenna concentrates its radiated power, and unlike amplifier gain it adds no power at all. An amplifier increases total signal power; an antenna only redistributes a fixed total, sending more energy in some directions and less in others. Antennas are passive devices that conserve power. Gain is expressed two ways. One compares the antenna to a hypothetical isotropic radiator that emits equally in every direction, giving units of decibels-isotropic, or dBi. The other compares it to a half-wave dipole, giving decibels-dipole, or dBd. Because a half-wave dipole already has a gain of 2.15 dBi, any figure in dBi runs exactly 2.15 decibels above the same figure in dBd. A high-gain antenna, such as a parabolic satellite television dish, reaches farther and delivers cleaner signal, but it must be aimed carefully at its target. A low-gain antenna, such as the whip on a portable radio or cordless phone, covers a wide angle, so its orientation hardly matters. Gain is bound to effective area, the patch of a passing wave's power an antenna can capture. A half-wave dipole has an effective area of about 0.13 wavelengths squared when viewed broadside. By reciprocity, an antenna's transmitting gain in any direction is proportional to its receiving effective area in that same direction, so the two figures describe one quantity from two sides.

  • Ground reflection is one of the common forms of multipath, and for a terrestrial antenna the earth is often the most important object nearby. The antenna's height above ground, along with the ground's permittivity and conductivity, shapes both the radiation pattern and the driving point impedance. When a wave strikes the ground, part passes into the soil and part reflects according to the Fresnel coefficients. A very good conductor reflects almost all of it, flipped 180 degrees in phase, while a lossy dielectric ground absorbs a large share of the power. The behavior changes with frequency. From very low frequencies up to about 30 megahertz the ground acts as a lossy dielectric, though at lower mediumwave frequencies it behaves as a good conductor, which AM broadcast antennas between 0.5 and 1.7 megahertz depend on. Between 3 and 30 megahertz, much of a horizontally polarized antenna's energy reflects off the ground, with nearly total reflection at the grazing angles that matter for ground wave propagation. That phase-reversed reflection can cancel or reinforce the direct wave depending on antenna height and elevation angle. Vertical polarization behaves differently. The ground reflects it poorly except at grazing incidence or over highly conducting surfaces like sea water, yet at the grazing angle the reflection arrives in phase with the direct wave, providing a boost of up to 6 dB. Above 30 megahertz the ground turns into a poorer reflector overall. When its surface irregularities stay much smaller than the wavelength, it reflects specularly, and a receiver effectively sees both the real antenna and a mirror image of it buried beneath the soil.

Common questions

What is an antenna in radio engineering?

An antenna, called an aerial in British English, is a structure that converts alternating electric currents into radio waves for transmission and converts radio waves back into electric currents for reception. It is the interface between radio waves propagating through space and electric currents moving in metal conductors, and it is an essential component of all radio equipment.

Who invented the first antenna and when?

The first antennas were built in 1886 by German physicist Heinrich Hertz during his experiments to prove the existence of electromagnetic waves predicted by James Clerk Maxwell's 1867 theory. Hertz placed dipole antennas at the focal point of parabolic reflectors for both transmitting and receiving.

Where does the word antenna come from?

The word antenna is attributed to Italian radio pioneer Guglielmo Marconi, who in the summer of 1895 experimented with long wire aerials suspended from a pole near Bologna. In Italian a tent pole is called l'antenna centrale, and the pole with the wire was simply called l'antenna; before then the radiating elements were known only as terminals.

What is the difference between a high-gain and a low-gain antenna?

A high-gain antenna radiates most of its power in a particular direction, offering longer range and better signal quality but requiring careful aiming, such as a parabolic satellite television dish. A low-gain antenna radiates over a wide angle with shorter range, so its orientation matters little, such as the whip antenna on portable radios and cordless phones.

How does a half-wave dipole antenna work?

A half-wave dipole consists of two quarter-wavelength elements arranged end-to-end along the same axis, each feeding one side of a two-conductor transmission line. The arrangement places the elements 180 degrees out of phase, so at any instant one element drives current into the line while the other pulls it out, creating a standing wave with maximum current at the feed point.

Why are resonant antennas narrow-band?

Resonant antennas efficiently feed a signal into the transmission line only when the source frequency is close to the antenna's design frequency or one of its resonant multiples. Away from that frequency the induced current arrives out of phase, the impedance no longer matches, and the signal reflects back into the antenna, so the design is useful only over a small range of frequencies centered on resonance.

How does the ground affect an antenna?

The ground can influence both the radiation pattern and the driving point impedance of a terrestrial antenna through its conductivity, permittivity, and the antenna's height above it. When a wave strikes the ground, part is reflected according to the Fresnel coefficients, and at frequencies between 3 and 30 megahertz a phase-reversed reflection can either cancel or reinforce the direct wave depending on antenna height and elevation angle.

All sources

44 references cited across the entry

  1. 1BookWebster's New World Telecom DictionaryRay Horak — John Wiley and Sons — 2008
  2. 2Newnes1999
  3. 3BookGuia Moderno do RadioescutaCristiano Amaral — Amazon — 2021
  4. 4JournalAnnalen der Physik und ChemieH. Hertz — 1889
  5. 6Wireless telegraphic communicationG. Marconi — 11 December 1909
  6. 7The history of radio engineering's term "antenna"Vadym Slyusar — 20–23 September 2011
  7. 11BookAntenna Theory and DesignRobert S. Elliott — Wyle — 1981
  8. 12JournalWideband Omnidirectional Antenna Featuring Small Azimuthal Gain VariationHonglin Zhang et al. — 2023-12-08
  9. 13BookThe ARRL Handbook for Radio Communications, Antenna Systems and Radio PropagationARRL — 2020
  10. 14BookStandard Broadcast Antenna SystemsCarl Smith — Smith Electronics — 1969
  11. 15BookFundamentals of Electromagnetics with MatlabKarl Erik Lonngren et al. — SciTech Publishing — 2007
  12. 16BookAntenna Theory and DesignWarren L. Stutzman et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 2012
  13. 17BookAntennas: Theory and practiceS.A. Schelkunoff et al. — John Wiley & Sons — 1952
  14. 18BookThe ARRL Antenna BookARRL — 1991
  15. 1960 Years of electrically small antenna theoryV.I. Slyusar — 17–21 September 2007
  16. 22Antenna Traps—A Way to Cope With Limited SpaceHaverstock Mark — 2021-05-25
  17. 27ReportYagi Antenna DesignPeter P. Viezbicke — National Bureau of Standards — 1976
  18. 29Electromagnetic FieldsReto B. Keller — Springer International Publishing — 2023
  19. 32Electromagnetic Plane WavesAnsys Innovation Courses — 2020
  20. 33JournalThe correct sense of Faraday rotationKatia Ferrière — 2021
  21. 34BookAntenna Theory: Analysis and DesignConstantine A. Balanis — Wiley — 2016
  22. 36BookON4UN's Low-Band DXingJohn Devoldere — ARRL — 2010
  23. 38Lecture 11: Loop AntennasNatalia K. Nikolova
  24. 40BookARRL Antenna BookAmerican Radio Relay League — 2011
  25. 42Silver (2011) p. 3‑23<!--hyphenated page#-->Silver — 2011
  26. 43BookFolded Unipole Antennas: Theory and applicationsJeremy Keith Raines — McGraw Hill — 2007
  27. 44BookAntennas: Theory and practiceSergei A. Schelkunoff et al. — John Wiley & Sons — July 1966