André Wink
André Wink was born in 1953, in Hollandia, Netherlands New Guinea. This location is now known as Jayapura, Indonesia. He studied at Leiden University and received a Ph.D. in Indian history in 1984. His doctoral advisor was the Indologist J.C. Heesterman. Until 1990, he researched and published from the Netherlands. He became a professor at the University of Wisconsin in 1989. From that position, he contributed to the field of history regarding India, Indonesia, and countries near the Indian Ocean. In 2009, he became a senior fellow.
In 1986, Wink published a socioeconomic history of the Marathas in eighteenth century. The book focused on agrarian society and politics under the Eighteenth-Century Maratha Svarajya. Reviews were largely favorable and his revisionist approach was admired. The work examined how land ownership shaped political power during this period. It challenged traditional views of rural society in India. Critics noted its detailed analysis of economic structures. The study provided new insights into how local rulers managed resources. It remains a key text for understanding Maratha governance.
Indologist Catherine Asher called the first volume of Al-Hind a ground-breaking volume. Published by Brill Academic in 1990, it covered the seventh through eleventh centuries. Wink examined the political, economic, and social impact of Islamic expansion on the Indian subcontinent. His central thesis linked Islam's spread to economic networks rather than just religious conversion. Bruce B. Lawrence described the scope as ambitious, even monumental. However, Lawrence argued the volume was seriously flawed by its too narrow focus. He claimed the author showed near total disregard of cultural actors, issues, and influences. Lawrence questioned Wink's glossing over India's past political history to make his economic theory stand. Some critics felt the book reduced Islamization to an expanding commercial network. Derryl MacLean noted signs of hasty research and composition affecting larger conjectures. MacLean criticized the cavalier manner with unattributed quotes from primary sources. He also pointed out numerous broad and unsupported statements. The work exhibited quasi-orientalist musings and chaotic transliterations that were clearly misreadings. Peter Jackson stated the book dealt with India and the entire Indian Ocean basin. He found the use of secondary literature highly impressive. Yet he criticized the willingness to accept some discredited dates. Jackson mentioned sources such as Chachnama as problematic. Despite these flaws, Jackson called the overall work important and stimulating.
Peter Jackson reviewed the second volume published in 1997 by Brill Academic. It covered the eleventh through thirteenth centuries. The geographical scope embraced not merely India and Ceylon but south-east Asia. This period saw a fusion between two different cultures. One was maritime trade and pastoral nomadism prevalent in Islamic controlled parts of West and Central Asia. The other was the settled and static agricultural world of India. The Delhi Sultanate became the crucible for processes of this fusion. Wink published a dedicated study on the conquest of India by Islamic armies. He analyzed military differences between invading and defending armies. The text covered raids, religious advisors, and early Delhi Sultanate history through 1290 CE. Later parts examined the impact of Islamic rule on maritime trade. Wink also discussed indigenous culture, iconoclasm, and Buddhism. Gavin Hambly found it an authoritative work of consummate scholarship and intellectual distinction. Richard Eaton stated the volume was wide-ranging and extensively researched. Eaton noted the central thesis on the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate as part of larger geo-cultural movement. He argued attacks and wars during this period had a major role in ending Buddhism within India. The shift occurred to Tibet, Sri Lanka, and southeast Asia. Eaton questioned the thesis on iqta and its impact on Indian economy. Numismatic evidence showed that the Indian economy was already highly monetized before Turkic conquests. Eaton criticized how quotations and sources were presented. He noted juxtaposing works composed hundreds of years apart without contextualizing them. Despite these difficulties, Eaton stated Volume 2 provides important and provocative new interpretations.
Richard Eaton reviewed the third volume published in 2003 by Brill Academic. It covered the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Eaton described it as a survey of the Indian Ocean region through the lens of geography. The book presented Indo-Islamic developments over this period as a fusion of nomadic central Asian culture with settled agrarian north Indian culture. This created post-nomadic empires of Ghurids and Khaljis. Eaton called this an elegant scheme if somewhat awkward. The text covered Habshi slaves and mercenaries from East Africa brought into India for military campaigns. These forces operated in Bengal, Gujarat, and the Deccan. Capitals and major cities such as Delhi and Devagiri were settled in fringes of semi-arid zones. They also appeared in non-arid lower Gangetic valley. Eaton questioned Wink's theory and understanding of religion and religious conversion in Malaysia. He raised doubts about Kashmir, eastern Bengal, and the Indonesian archipelago. After reviewing the book, one feels the need to identify more precisely the mechanisms by which Muslim societies emerged. Wink suggested threats, humiliation, destruction of temples, or fusion of nomadic-settled cultures explained this. Eaton argued these factors did not fully explain the emergence. Sanjay Subrahmanyam found the third volume less polemical than its predecessors but had a less clear thesis. Subrahmanyam noted Wink had a persistent tendency of using anachronistic sources. These were penned centuries after the events against contemporary sources. His choice of using old non-critical translations was criticized. Overall, Subrahmanyam noted the volume clearly demarcated the thin line between boldness and intellectual courage on one hand. On the other, it became chutzpah that eventually turned into mere hubris.
Historian Roy S. Fischel believed Wink's work offered a unique and significant contribution to the discussion of Islam's introduction to India. However, he thought some approaches had limitations. Namely, Wink's overuse of dichotomies downplayed flexibility of categories like mobile and settled. The broad scale covering over a millennium made books not easily accessible to audiences without prior knowledge. P. P. Barua disagreed stating Making of the Indo-Islamic World synthesized prior works making it more accessible. Derryl MacLean criticized the cavalier manner with unattributed quotes from primary sources. He pointed out numerous broad and unsupported statements. Peter Jackson listed irritating distractions and slips in place names. Richard Eaton questioned how quotations and sources were presented. Sanjay Subrahmanyam observed the first two volumes had admirers but did not entirely allay fears about dominating such vast field. The uneven state of historiography and myriad sources posed challenges. Some critics felt the book reduced Islamization to an expanding commercial network. Others argued it failed to detect central themes beyond trade importance. Sunil Kumar noted the author seldom extended beyond cut and paste methodology. K.S. Shrimali found the work neo-colonialist. Ranabir Chakravarti expressed surprise that discussions on Rashtrakutas were solely based on Arabic chronicles. Viswa Mohan Jha deemed it an impossible caricature replete with references that did not support text. Despite these criticisms, many scholars acknowledged the work broke new ground in originality of ideas.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
When and where was André Wink born?
André Wink was born in 1953, in Hollandia, Netherlands New Guinea. This location is now known as Jayapura, Indonesia.
What did André Wink study at Leiden University?
André Wink received a Ph.D. in Indian history in 1984 from Leiden University. His doctoral advisor was the Indologist J.C. Heesterman.
Which book by André Wink covers the socioeconomic history of the Marathas?
In 1986, Wink published a socioeconomic history of the Marathas in eighteenth century. The book focused on agrarian society and politics under the Eighteenth-Century Maratha Svarajya.
How many volumes does the Al-Hind series by André Wink contain and when were they published?
The first volume of Al-Hind was published by Brill Academic in 1990 covering the seventh through eleventh centuries. The second volume appeared in 1997 covering the eleventh through thirteenth centuries, and the third volume was published in 2003 covering the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.
Who reviewed the three volumes of Al-Hind by André Wink and what were their main criticisms?
Peter Jackson reviewed the second volume published in 1997 and criticized the willingness to accept some discredited dates. Richard Eaton reviewed the third volume published in 2003 and raised doubts about Wink's theory regarding religion and religious conversion in Malaysia.