Ancient Carthage

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Ancient Carthage was once the richest city in the western Mediterranean, a Phoenician-descended power that controlled the coasts of North Africa, Iberia, and the islands of Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica, Malta, and the Balearic Islands. By 300 BC, it commanded a quarter of a million inhabitants and a navy that rivaled anything the ancient world had to offer. And yet, almost everything we know about Carthage comes from its enemies. When Rome finally destroyed the city in 146 BC, it burned virtually every Carthaginian text along with it. What remains is a portrait painted almost entirely by Greeks and Romans, many of whom were writing during or after years of brutal war. The questions that follow from that erasure are striking: what kind of civilization was Carthage, really? How did a small Phoenician trading colony in present-day Tunisia grow into a Mediterranean empire? And why, of all the ancient powers, did Rome feel compelled not just to defeat Carthage, but to obliterate it?

• 2. From Tyre to New City

  ›

  Tyre, the wealthiest of the Phoenician city-states in present-day Lebanon, founded Carthage around 814 BC. The site chosen on the Gulf of Tunis offered strategic geography that almost no other coastal location could match: a hilly, triangular peninsula connected to the mainland by a single narrow strip of land, a citadel on the low hill of Byrsa overlooking the sea, and the Lake of Tunis behind the city providing fish and safe harbor. Within a century of its founding, the population rose to 30,000, an extraordinary expansion for any ancient colony.

  The name itself tells the story. The city's Punic name, Qart-Ḥadašt, simply means "New City", a name that scholar Brett Mulligan has vocalized from the Phoenician inscription. That naming gesture, understated and practical, matches the character of the Phoenician colonizers. The Tyrians were not interested in grand territorial conquest; they wanted safe harbors, trade monopolies, and access to raw materials. Most of their colonies held fewer than 1,000 people and existed purely for commercial purposes.

  Carthage defied that pattern. Unlike other Phoenician settlements, it benefited from a combination of fertile agricultural land, rich mineral deposits, and trade routes reaching from West Asia to Northern Europe. When Tyre's own power began to wane in the 7th century BC following Babylonian sieges, the colony had already grown wealthy enough that the Persian king Cambyses apparently contemplated a long expedition to conquer it. According to Herodotus, the Tyrians refused to assist that Persian campaign because of their continuing affinity for Carthage, causing the king to abandon his plans. That Carthage was worth protecting, even at political cost, says something about how far it had come from its origins as a trading outpost on a narrow peninsula.

• 3. Empire Without Conquest

  ›

  Mago I, who ruled roughly between 550 and 530 BC, is credited by Justin as the first Carthaginian leader to put the military system in proper order. He introduced the practice of recruiting mercenaries and subject peoples, drawing on Libyans, Iberians, Sardinians, and Corsicans for the Magonid expansionist campaigns, because Carthage's own population was too small to secure its scattered colonies. That pragmatic approach to military power became a defining feature of the Carthaginian empire.

  What Carthage built was not an empire in the Roman sense. It took control of nearby Phoenician colonies including Hadrumetum, Utica, Hippo Diarrhytus, and Kerkouane, and subjugated neighboring Libyan tribes. But the empire was largely informal, held together by treaties, alliances, tributary obligations, and defensive pacts. Historian comparisons have drawn parallels to the Delian League led by Athens, to the Spartan system of subject peoples serving as serfs for the elite, and even to Rome's own tributary arrangements, but none of those analogies fully captures what Carthage had built.

  The key difference from Rome was one of philosophy. Carthage emphasized maritime trade over territorial expansion. Its settlements clustered on coastal areas, and it invested more heavily in its navy than in land forces. In 509 BC, the first treaty between Carthage and Rome already conveyed that Carthage held effective control over Sicily and Sardinia, and that Rome's influence was limited to parts of central and southern Italy. At that moment, Carthage controlled more territory than the Roman Republic. The treaty also demonstrated something remarkable: Carthage and Rome were, at minimum, equals. That parity would not last.

• 4. A Government Unlike Any Other

  ›

  Aristotle's fourth-century BC treatise, Politics, includes Carthage as its only non-Greek example of government worthy of serious analysis. He praises its constitution as sophisticated and functional, describing Carthage as fulfilling "all needs of moderation and justice." His contemporary Isocrates went further, calling Carthage's system the best in antiquity, equaled only by Sparta. That two Athenian intellectuals, members of a culture that firmly believed only Greeks could found true polities, would extend such praise to Carthage is striking.

  At the top of the system stood two sufetes, or "judges", elected annually from the wealthiest and most influential families. Livy compared them to Roman consuls, but they were weaker in one crucial respect: the sufetes had no power over the military. Generals held entirely separate offices, serving for the duration of a war rather than fixed terms. This separation of military and political power was almost unique in antiquity. The council of elders, called the Adirim, perhaps numbered thirty members and administered the treasury and conducted foreign affairs. Above even that stood the One Hundred and Four, a judicial tribunal that could impose fines, and even crucifixion, on generals and officials who failed to serve the republic's interests.

  Polybius states that during the Punic Wars, the Carthaginian public held more sway over government than the Romans did over theirs, but he considered this a fatal flaw. While Carthaginians debated, the Romans acted. That observation would prove prophetic. The scholar Eratosthenes, head of the Library of Alexandria and himself a Greek, praised the Carthaginians as among the few non-Greeks to be "admirably" governed. That Carthage extended versions of this system to its colonies is suggested by inscriptions from Punic-era Sardinia, which date documents with the names of four sufetes: two from the island and two from Carthage itself.

• 5. Sicily, the Endless War

  ›

  In 480 BC, Gelo, the tyrant of Syracuse, attempted to unite Sicily under his rule. Carthage intervened militarily under King Hamilcar of the Magonid dynasty. Traditional accounts, including those by Herodotus and Diodorus, number Hamilcar's army at around 300,000, though that figure is almost certainly an exaggeration. What is not disputed is that the Carthaginian force landed at Panormus, modern-day Palermo, and marched along the coast to Himera, where the Greeks of Syracuse and their ally Agrigentum won a decisive victory. Hamilcar was either killed in the battle or committed suicide in shame.

  The loss prompted Carthage to reform its political system into an oligarchic republic with new checks on rulers. But Sicily remained an obsession. By 410 BC, Carthage had recovered, and Hanno the Navigator had journeyed down the West African coast while Himilco the Navigator explored the European Atlantic coast. Hannibal Mago, grandson of the defeated Hamilcar, led a return expedition to Sicily in 409 BC, capturing Selinus and Himera. But plague devastated Carthaginian forces repeatedly in subsequent campaigns, killing Hannibal Mago during the siege of Agrigentum in 405 BC and forcing his successor Himilco to sue for peace. When Himilco returned to Carthage in disgrace after one such failure, he committed suicide by starving himself.

  By 340 BC, Carthage had been pushed entirely into the southwest corner of Sicily. When Pyrrhus of Epirus entered the conflict around 280 BC, his navy dealt a devastating blow in the Battle of the Strait of Messina, sinking or disabling 98 out of 110 Carthaginian ships, according to both Plutarch and Appian. Pyrrhus nearly took the entire island, forcing Carthage back to a single stronghold at Lilybaeum. As he departed Sicily, he reportedly told his companions, "What a wrestling ground we are leaving, my friends, for the Carthaginians and the Romans." It was prescient. The conflict that followed would be neither contained to Sicily nor limited to a generation.

• 6. The Punic Wars

  ›

  When Agathocles of Syracuse died in 288 BC, a company of Italian mercenaries who had served him seized the city of Messana and named themselves Mamertines, "Sons of Mars." Their growing threat brought both Carthage and Rome into confrontation over who would control the Strait of Messina, the narrow channel between Sicily and Italy. Carthage arrived first, sending a garrison and a fleet into Messana's harbor. Rome followed. The Roman attack on Carthaginian forces at Messana in 264 BC triggered the First Punic War.

  The wars that followed spanned from 264 to 146 BC. The Second Punic War brought Hannibal's audacious overland march across the Alps and crushing victories at the Battle of the Trebia, the ambush at Trasimene, and the catastrophic Roman defeat at Cannae, where an estimated 60,000 Romans fell. Many Roman allies switched sides to Carthage, prolonging the war in Italy for over a decade. But Rome could absorb losses that Carthage could not. Scipio Africanus ended Carthaginian rule over Iberia at the Battle of Ilipa, then forced Hannibal to abandon Italy for the final confrontation at Zama, in the Carthaginian heartland of Tunisia. The defeat was total. Carthage was stripped of its navy and reduced to its North African territory, effectively becoming a Roman client state.

  The third war, beginning in 149 BC, was largely the work of Cato the Elder, who reportedly concluded nearly every speech in the Roman Senate, regardless of the subject, with the phrase ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam: "Moreover, I am of the opinion that Carthage ought to be destroyed." Carthage's border war with Rome's ally Numidia gave the pretext. Despite its dramatically reduced military, Carthage held out for three years, even using fire ships to inflict losses on the Roman fleet, until Scipio Aemilianus, the adopted grandson of Scipio Africanus, took command of the siege. The city fell in 146 BC. Tens of thousands of Carthaginians were killed or enslaved. Every Carthaginian text was destroyed along with the city.

• 7. What Survived

  ›

  Rome built a new city on the ruins. Julius Caesar began construction of Roman Carthage between 49 and 44 BC. By the first century AD, Carthago had grown to be the second-largest city in the western Roman Empire, with a peak population of 500,000. The province of Africa became one of the empire's wealthiest, a major supplier of grain.

  Punic language and identity did not vanish with the city's walls. In the fourth century, Augustine of Hippo noted that Punic was still spoken in the region by people who identified themselves as Chanani, the Carthaginian self-designation. Two Roman emperors in the third century, Septimius Severus and his son Caracalla, were of Libyan Berber descent and spoke Latin with a Punic accent. Sufetes governed towns and cities across Roman Africa well into the second century AD; over forty post-Carthaginian settlements attested to the office, from Althiburos to Thugga to Volubilis in modern-day Morocco.

  Even Latin vocabulary absorbed Carthage. The word for pomegranate entered Latin as mala Punica, "Punic apples." A technique of laying patterned terracotta pieces in mosaics was called pavimentum Punicum. The threshing board the Carthaginians introduced to the Romans was called plostellum Punicum. Mago's manual on farming and estate management was among the few Carthaginian texts spared, translated into both Greek and Latin by order of the Senate. Dishonesty and treachery, meanwhile, became Pūnica fidēs, "Punic faith", a phrase that reflects the enduring hostility and the degree to which Rome's victory shaped how Carthage would be remembered for centuries.