— Ch. 1 · The Alabama's Departure —
Alabama Claims.
~4 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
In 1863, the Confederate commerce raider CSS Alabama slipped out of the shipyards at Birkenhead. British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston and Foreign Secretary Lord John Russell failed to stop her from putting to sea. The United States Legation in London had explicitly opposed this departure. American Minister Charles Francis Adams charged that the ship was bound for the Confederacy. He argued it would be used against the United States. The Government requested advice from Sir Alexander Cockburn, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. He ruled that her release did not violate Britain's neutrality because she was not outfitted with guns when leaving port. This legal loophole allowed the vessel to begin its destructive campaign.
Neutrality Violations Exposed
British public opinion remained divided on the issue during construction. MPs such as Richard Cobden campaigned against allowing the ship to leave. The subsequent departure proved publicly embarrassing for the government. Palmerston and Russell were later forced to admit the ship should not have been allowed to depart. In the following year, Britain detained two ironclad warships constructed in Birkenhead. These vessels were destined for the Confederacy. An uproar over the Alabama prompted Palmerston to instruct the Admiralty to purchase them. A go-between named Monsieur Bravay of Paris ordered their construction as an intermediary for Confederate principals. The incident highlighted deep failures within British political oversight regarding naval exports.