Agnatha
Agnatha means jawless fish, and it names a group defined by something missing. These animals have no jaws. Around 500 million years ago, two kinds of recombinatorial adaptive immune systems arose in vertebrates, and the jawless line took a path nobody else followed. Today only about 120 species of jawless fish survive, a minor element of modern marine life. Yet in the early Paleozoic they were everywhere, and one of their armored kinds gave rise to bony fish, and through them to tetrapods, including humans. How does a fish without a jaw eat, defend itself, and reproduce? Why do the two surviving kinds, hagfishes and lampreys, refuse to fit neatly into the vertebrate family tree? And why can the word Agnatha not even be made into a coherent group without either gutting it or swallowing all of Vertebrata?
Agnathan teeth cannot move up and down, so the kinds of food these animals can take are limited. Hagfish use a row of sharp teeth to break down dead animals, feeding mostly as scavengers, though they have also been observed hunting. Lampreys feed on carrion as well as on other fish and marine mammals, while some species are not carnivorous at all. When a lamprey latches onto a host, it injects anticoagulant fluids that prevent the blood from clotting, making the host yield more blood. Inside, the body is just as spare. Agnathans have no distinct stomach, only a long gut that is more or less the same along its whole length. Being ectothermic, they do not regulate their own body temperature, and their metabolism runs slow in cold water. A slow metabolism means they do not have to eat very much, an economy of effort that suits an animal built without a biting jaw.
Hagfish skin carries copious slime glands, and that slime is their defense. The slime can clog the gills of an enemy fish and kill it. Modern agnathans are covered in plain skin, with neither dermal nor epidermal scales over the body. The skeleton is cartilaginous, the heart holds two chambers, and lampreys carry a light-sensitive pineal eye that is homologous to the pineal gland in mammals. Almost all agnathans, living and extinct, lack paired appendages, though most do have a dorsal or a caudal fin. The extinct relatives tell a sharply different story. Many sported extensive exoskeletons of massive, heavy dermal armor or small mineralized scales. Some fossil agnathans, such as osteostracans and pituriaspids, even had paired fins, a trait their jawed descendants would inherit.
It is believed that a hagfish produces only 30 eggs over an entire lifetime. Much about hagfish reproduction stays unknown; even the mode of fertilization has not been established, and there is little of the larval stage that defines the lamprey. Lampreys reproduce in freshwater riverbeds, where pairs work together to build a nest and bury their eggs about an inch beneath the sediment. Fertilization in lampreys is external, development is probably external in both groups, and there is no known parental care. A lamprey can only reproduce once. The hatchlings that emerge spend four years in larval development before they become adults.
Myxini, the hagfishes, are eel-shaped slime-producing marine animals sometimes called slime eels. They are the only known living animals that possess a skull but no vertebral column, and they have undergone the most extensive gene loss of any vertebrate, missing 1,386 gene families. Living hagfish remain similar to hagfish of 300 million years ago, true living fossils. Lampreys belong to Petromyzontida, also called Hyperoartia, a disputed group covering modern lampreys and their fossil relatives. Early examples in their record, Endeiolepis and Euphanerops, were fish-like animals with hypocercal tails that lived during the Late Devonian. Even the existence of Hyperoartia is contested, with some analyses treating the basal forms as a lineage called Jamoytiiformes that may sit very close to the ancestors of jawed vertebrates. Both surviving kinds share an immune system unlike anything in jawed animals. Where jawed vertebrates build their defenses by rearranging V(D)J gene segments, jawless vertebrates rely on variable lymphocyte receptors assembled from highly diverse leucine-rich-repeat sequences. Three such genes, VLRA, VLRB, and VLRC, appear in lampreys and hagfish. VLRA and VLRC cells are T-cell-like and develop in a thymus-like structure called a thymoid, while VLRB cells are B-cell-like and mature into plasma cells that secrete VLRB antibody.
Conodonts were eel-like jawless animals that lived from the Cambrian until the beginning of the Jurassic, and for over a century they were known only from microscopic phosphatic tooth structures called conodont elements. Not until the mid-1980s did body fossils turn up, in Scotland and Wisconsin, revealing what these animals actually looked like. Their teeth make excellent index fossils, since many species lived and died out over short spans, useful from the late Cambrian to the Triassic. Conodonts were strikingly varied in lifestyle, ranging from filter feeders to macropredators. They peaked in diversity during the middle Ordovician, were struck hard by the Ordovician-Silurian extinction, surged again in the mid-late Devonian, then declined in the Carboniferous and grew rare in the Permian. In the early Triassic their numbers rose dramatically. They finally went extinct in the lower Jurassic, with some of the last populations holding on in Japan, perhaps protected by the remoteness of the area. They were once thought wiped out by the end-Triassic extinction, but it now appears newer Mesozoic taxa out-competed them.
Two Early Cambrian animals with fins, vertebrate musculature, and gills are known from the Maotianshan shales of China: Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia, tentatively assigned to Agnatha by Janvier. A third possible agnathan from the same region is Haikouella, and Simonetti reported another, undescribed, from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. The myllokunmingiids, endemic to the Maotianshan Shales, count as the earliest known craniates, chordates with a skull of hard bone or cartilage. The first armored agnathans, the ostracoderms, appear in the middle Ordovician, and by the Late Silurian the agnathans reached the high point of their evolution. Many Ordovician, Silurian, and Devonian forms wore heavy bony-spiky plates. The ostracoderms themselves were a varied lot. Pteraspidomorphi bore extensive head shielding and dermal bone, with sucking mouth parts and hypocercal tails, some perhaps living in fresh water, holding the subgroups Heterostraci, Astraspida, and Arandaspida. Thelodonti, the nipple teeth, carried small spiny scales rather than large plates, and those scales scattered so easily after death that they became the most common vertebrate fossil of their time. Anaspida, meaning without shield, were small marine forms with a striking hypocercal tail, classically regarded as the ancestors of lampreys. Cephalaspidomorphi, named for the osteostracan genus Cephalaspis, were heavily armored with well-developed head shields, lateral line grooves across the surface, small eyes set on top of the head, and a mouth ringed by small plates that allowed flexible lips but no ability to bite.
Most ostracoderms, including thelodonts, osteostracans, and galeaspids, were more closely related to the jawed gnathostomes than to the surviving cyclostomes. Cyclostomes apparently split from other agnathans before dentine and bone evolved, traits present in many fossil agnathans, including conodonts. This is the knot at the heart of the group. Conodonta was jawless, yet had it kept going, its descendants would be more closely related to humans than to lampreys. Because of that, Agnatha cannot be made into a coherent grouping without either removing every non-cyclostome or swallowing all of Vertebrata and becoming a junior synonym for it. The agnathans declined in the Devonian and never recovered. Molecular data from rRNA and mtDNA, together with embryological data, strongly supports the view that hagfishes and lampreys are more closely related to each other than to jawed fish, forming the superclass Cyclostomi. Hagfish count as members of Vertebrata because they secondarily lost their vertebrae, a conclusion drawn from molecular and developmental data, and the newer phylogeny from Miyashita and colleagues in 2019 is considered compatible with both the morphological and the molecular evidence.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is Agnatha and what makes jawless fish different?
Agnatha, or jawless fish, is a paraphyletic infraphylum of vertebrates characterized by the lack of jaws. The group includes living cyclostomes such as hagfishes and lampreys, along with extinct clades like conodonts and cephalaspidomorphs.
How many species of jawless fish are alive today?
Living jawless fish comprise about 120 species in total. They are a minor element of modern marine fauna, though agnathans were prominent among the early fish of the early Paleozoic.
How do jawless fish eat without jaws?
Agnathan teeth cannot move up and down, which limits their possible food types. Hagfish scavenge mostly dead animals using a row of sharp teeth, while lampreys feed on carrion and other fish and inject anticoagulant fluids into a host to make it yield more blood.
Why is hagfish slime important to Agnatha?
The skin of hagfish has copious slime glands, and the slime is their defense mechanism. The slime can clog up the gills of enemy fishes, causing them to die.
How do lampreys in the Agnatha group reproduce?
Lampreys reproduce in freshwater riverbeds, working in pairs to build a nest and burying their eggs about an inch beneath the sediment. Fertilization is external, lampreys can only reproduce once, and the hatchlings go through four years of larval development before becoming adults.
When did conodonts in the Agnatha group go extinct?
Conodonts lived from the Cambrian until the beginning of the Jurassic and went extinct during the lower Jurassic period, with some of the last surviving populations in Japan. It is now thought they were out-competed by newer Mesozoic taxa rather than wiped out by the end-Triassic extinction.
Are hagfishes and lampreys closely related in Agnatha?
Molecular data from rRNA and mtDNA, together with embryological data, strongly supports that hagfishes and lampreys are more closely related to each other than to jawed fish, forming the superclass Cyclostomi. Recent DNA evidence supports grouping them together as cyclostomes.
All sources
41 references cited across the entry
- 1journalGeochronological constraint on the Cambrian Chengjiang biota, South ChinaChuan Yang et al. — 2018
- 2journalThelodonts and distribution of associated conodonts from the Llandovery-lowermost Lochkovian of the Welsh BorderlandT. Märss et al. — 2004
- 3journalA Higher Level Classification of All Living OrganismsMichael Ruggiero et al. — April 2015
- 4journalmicroRNAs reveal the interrelationships of hagfish, lampreys, and gnathostomes and the nature of the ancestral vertebrateAlysha M. Heimberg et al. — 2010-11-09
- 5journal28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishesJ. Mallatt et al. — December 1998
- 6journalComplete mitochondrial DNA of the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: The comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences strongly supports the cyclostome monophylyDelarbre C, Gallut C, Barriel V, Janvier P, Gachelin G — February 2002
- 7journalCraniofacial development of hagfishes and the evolution of vertebratesOisi Y, Ota KG, Kuraku S, Fujimoto S, Kuratani S — January 2013
- 8journalMicroRNAs revive old views about jawless vertebrate divergence and evolutionP. Janvier — November 2010
- 9journalEvidence from 18S ribosomal RNA sequences that lampreys and hagfishes form a natural groupD.W. Stock et al. — August 1992
- 10journalIdentification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfishOta KG, Fujimoto S, Oisi Y, Kuratani S — June 2011
- 11citationThe Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and Distribution of LampreysIan C. Potter et al. — Springer Netherlands — 2014-11-25
- 12journalHagfish predatory behaviour and slime defence mechanismV. Zintzen et al. — 2011
- 13webHagfishAquaticcommunity.com
- 14bookEarth System HistorySteven M. Stanley et al. — Macmillan Education — 2015
- 15journalConodonts: past, present and futureW. C. Sweet et al. — 2001
- 16journalThe evolution and elaboration of vertebrate neural crest cellsBaker CV — December 2008
- 17bookAdvances in ImmunologyMasayuki Hirano et al. — Academic Press — 2011-01-01
- 18journalAn inhibitory receptor of VLRB in the agnathan lampreyFenfang Wu et al. — October 2016
- 19journalThe hagfish genome and the evolution of vertebratesFerdinand Marlétaz et al. — 2024
- 20webIntroduction to the MyxiniBrian R. Speer — University of California, Berkeley — 1997
- 21journalA paleontological perspective of vertebrate originDegan Shu — April 2003
- 22journalFamily-group names of fossil fishesRichard van der Laan — 2016
- 23journalC.H. Pander's introduction to conodonts, 1856Sweet, Walter C. et al. — December 2008
- 24journalA giant conodont with preserved muscle tissue from the Upper Ordovician of South AfricaS.E. Gabbott — 1995
- 25journalEffects of extraction protocols on the oxygen isotope composition of conodont elementsPage C. Quinton — 2016
- 26journalAppalachignathus, a New Multielement Conodont Genus from the Middle Ordovician of North AmericaS. M. Bergström et al. — 1974
- 27journalGlobal climate changes account for the main trends of conodont diversity but not for their final demiseSamuel Ginot et al. — December 2020
- 28journalLower Jurassic conodonts from the Inuyama area of Japan: implications for conodont extinctionYixing Du et al. — 2023
- 29journalThelodont and other agnathan distributions as tests of Lower Paleozoic continental reconstructionsTurner S, Tarling DH — 1982
- 30bookVertebrate fossils and the evolution of scientific concepts: Writings in tribute to Beverly HalsteadSarjeant WA, Halstead LB — Gordon and Breach — 1995
- 31journalConodont affinity and chordate phylogenyDonoghue PC, Forey PL, Aldridge RJ — May 2000
- 32reportPalaeocommunities – Project Ecostratigraphy, Final ReportTurner S — Cambridge University Press — 1999
- 33webThelodontiKazlev MA, White T — March 6, 2001
- 34journalSquamation and ecology of thelodontsFerrón HG, Botella H — 2017
- 35bookMajor events in early vertebrate evolution: Palaeontology, phylogeny, genetics, and developmentPer Erik Ahlberg — Taylor & Francis — 2001
- 36bookMolecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or compromise?Colin Patterson — Cambridge University Press — 1987
- 37bookThe SkullBrian Keith Hall et al. — University of Chicago Press — 1993
- 38bookEvolution of the Vertebrates: A history of the backboned animals through timeMichael Colbert et al. — Wiley-Liss — 1991
- 39webChordata – lancets, tunicates, and vertebratesMikko Haaramo — 2007
- 40journalA phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicatesDelsuc F, Philippe H, Tsagkogeorga G, Simion P, Tilak MK, Turon X, López-Legentil S, Piette J, Lemaire P, Douzery EJ — April 2018
- 41journalHagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogenyTetsuto Miyashita et al. — 2019