Óðr

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Óðr is one of Norse mythology's most elusive figures. His name means "soul," "mind," "wit," or "sense" in Old Norse, and also carries the weight of "song" and "poetry." Scholar Andy Orchard translates an additional epithet as "the frenzied one." He is the husband of Freyja, one of the most celebrated goddesses of the Norse world, and the father of a daughter so beautiful that her name, Hnoss, became the Old Norse word for "treasures." Yet despite this prominent family, Óðr barely appears in the surviving sources. His husband-ship is stated, his journeys are noted, and then he vanishes. What little is preserved raises questions that scholars have wrestled with for centuries. Was Óðr a god in his own right, or an older, pared-down version of Odin himself? Did his name carry a memory of a tradition predating the Viking Age? And why does Freyja weep tears of red gold for a figure almost no text will describe?

• 2. A Name Older Than Odin

  ›

  Philologist Jan de Vries proposed that Óðr and Odin were originally a single figure, and that Óðr is the elder form. The Old Norse name Óðr derives from a Proto-Germanic root, wōðaz, meaning "possessed, inspired, delirious, raging." Odin's own name, Óðinn, comes from the same stem with the suffix -naz attached, meaning "master of." De Vries compared this pairing to the divine doublet Ullr and Ullinn, where two names appear to preserve an older and a younger form of the same deity. Scholar Stephan Grundy agreed, writing that "there is little doubt" Óðr and Odin were once the same figure, with Óðinn being an adjectival form built on Óðr. Scholar Rudolf Simek also noted the similarity between their names and the parallel to Ullr and Ullin, while observing that the most straightforward reading is simply to identify the two. The word root itself has relatives in other Germanic languages: Old English wōð meant "sound, noise; voice, song"; Old High German wuot carried the sense of "thrill, violent agitation"; Middle Dutch woet meant "rage, frenzy." These were not gentle meanings. They pointed to a concept of divine possession, of being seized by something beyond ordinary thought.

• 3. Ties to Celtic Seers

  ›

  The Proto-Germanic root wōðaz traces back further, to a Pre-Germanic form uoh₂-tós. That form is related to the Proto-Celtic term wātis, meaning "seer" or "soothsayer." The Gaulish word wāteis and the Old Irish fáith, meaning "prophet," are part of the same family. So is the Old Irish fáth, meaning "prophetic wisdom, maxims," and Old Welsh guaut, meaning "prophetic verse, panegyric." Some scholars hold that the Latin vātēs, meaning "prophet" or "seer," was borrowed into Latin from Gaulish, making the underlying concept a shared religious term across Germanic and Celtic cultures rather than a purely inherited Proto-Indo-European word. If that borrowing scenario is set aside, a Proto-Indo-European ancestor can be reconstructed as *(H)ueh₂-tis, meaning "prophet" or "seer." What this suggests is that the concept embedded in Óðr's name is ancient and wide-ranging. The frenzied one was not merely a Norse notion; the idea of divine inspiration as a kind of possession was woven into many of the languages that surrounded the early Norse world.

• 4. The Weeping Goddess

  ›

  In chapter 35 of the Prose Edda book Gylfaginning, the enthroned figure called High describes Freyja's marriage to Óðr in plain terms. Óðr would depart on long journeys, and Freyja would remain behind weeping tears of red gold. She did not stay still for long, though. She traveled among strange peoples in search of him, and this wandering gave her many names. In chapter 1 of the Heimskringla book Ynglinga saga, Snorri Sturluson adds that Óðr and Freyja had two daughters, Hnoss and Gersemi, and that both names literally mean "jewel." Snorri writes that the girls were so beautiful that their names came to stand for "our most precious possessions." The Poetic Edda poem Völuspá, stanza 25, names Freyja by the kenning "Óðs mey," meaning "Óðr's girl." In the poem Hyndluljóð, stanza 47, the giantess Hyndla taunts Freyja by saying she had run to a figure called Œdi, "always full of desire." Whether Œdi is Óðr or a separate lover of Freyja is disputed. Scholar Carolyne Larrington calls the identity of Œdi uncertain. Scholar John Lindow describes the reference as "puzzling." Scholar Britt-Mari Näsström argues the line does not refer to Óðr at all, and comments that "perhaps the philologists of the nineteenth century were misled by their romantic intentions" in making the connection.

• 5. A Strange Double of Odin

  ›

  Scholar Hilda Ellis Davidson proposed that a cult of the Vanir may have influenced a cult of the Æsir in the waning days of Norse paganism, during the Christianization of Scandinavia, and that this process may have produced Óðr as what she called a "strange double of Odin." Simek pressed hard on both sides of the identification question. He noted that Snorri was careful to keep Óðr and Odin apart in his texts, yet argued that the names are so close that a complete lack of connection is impossible. Simek identified specific difficulties with full identification: "Freyja's tears for Odin and her search are unmotivated," and "the reference to Hnoss as their only child is surprising." He asked why Baldr, Odin's son, would not be mentioned if the two gods were truly the same. Simek noted that earlier scholars had reached sometimes very different conclusions. Sophus Bugge and Hjalmar Falk saw a reflection of the Greek god Adonis in Óðr. Rudolf Much proposed the Phrygian god Attis. Lee Hollander theorized a reflection of the folktale of Amor and Psyche in Snorri's account. Grundy pushed back on the idea that Óðr was a later Christian-era invention, pointing to a separate, independent figure named Wod surviving in folklore connected to the Wild Hunt in areas as far south from Scandinavia as Switzerland. That survival suggests Óðr dates to at least before the Viking Age.

• 6. Polygamy and the Divine Household

  ›

  Grundy raised a rarely discussed possibility that cuts through several competing theories. He argued that Frigg and Freyja did not originate from a single goddess, and that if they did not, the question of explaining Freyja's relationship with Óðr becomes central. That question has been one of the strongest arguments used to support the descent of both goddesses from a common ancestor. But Grundy pointed in a different direction: the Germanic peoples sometimes practiced polygamy. He cited chapter 18 of the Roman historian Tacitus' 1st century AD work Germania, where Tacitus records that while monogamy prevailed among Germanic peoples, some sought polygamous marriages "for the sake of high birth." Grundy pointed to polygynous marriages among the Merovingians and Carolingians, noted that the only Germanic law code expressly forbidding such relationships was the Visigoth code, and cited Harald I of Norway, who was married to seven wives simultaneously. Grundy concluded that gods tend to reflect the social norms of their worshippers, and that Odin and Óðr may originally "have rejoiced in Frigg and Freyja simultaneously." Over time, as polygynous marriages became less common during the Viking Age and into the Christianization of the North Germanic territories, such a relationship became harder to reflect in the stories of the gods, and the single figure may have separated into two. Scholar Viktor Rydberg offered a different angle still, proposing that Freyja's husband Óðr is identical with the hero Svipdag from the Eddic poems Grougaldr and Fjölsvinsmál, where Jacob Grimm and others had long identified Svipdag's love interest Menglad with Freyja herself.